论滥用职权的司法审查
发布时间:2018-02-26 22:38
本文关键词: 滥用职权 司法审查 行政职权 出处:《北方工业大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:服务型政府建设对政府的各项行政行为提出了更高的要求。权力具有天然的腐败性,不可避免的会发生对行政职权的滥用。如何停止政府滥用职权,为受侵害的行政相对人提供救济,是我们所要面对并加以解决的问题。本文欲从如下几个部分进行论述。首先是进行整体概述,主要是对滥用职权及其相关的概念进行厘清。任何一项研究必需要对所研究的对象有清晰的认识,否则会导致整个研究方向的偏离,以及内容的含混不清。与滥用职权相关的概念有很多,笔者选取了自由裁量和行政裁量两个概念,并且介绍了当前学界更加倾向于使用行政裁量这一概念。尽管国内外学者对概念的理解存在分歧,但笔者认为这并非是问题的关键。其次,是对我国当前滥用职权的审判案例进行实证研究。通过对检索到的案例样本进行数据统计,并对统计结果加以研究,从数据中发现司法实践中对行政滥用职权的司法审查依然存在问题。在上述案例总体数据的研究基础上筛选出有代表性的案例进行深入分析,从实证角度观察法官对滥用职权是以何种标准进行认定。由于对滥用职权进行司法审查,不可避免的会涉及到司法裁量与行政裁量二者之间如何平衡的问题,这也是我国对滥用职权的司法审查不尽如人意的症结所在。笔者在介绍行政裁量发展脉络的基础上,说明了对行政裁量行为的审查已成必然,但同时又必须给及行政裁量行为足够的尊重。裁量的价值和危险是并存的,因此必须恰当掌握好司法裁量权与行政裁量之间的边界。最后一部分是笔者针对当前学术理论和司法实践中问题进行分析后,尝试为我国滥用职权的司法审查提出几点自己的想法,以期促进问题的解决。
[Abstract]:The construction of service-oriented government has put forward higher requirements for various administrative actions of the government. The power has the nature of corruption, and the abuse of the administrative authority will inevitably occur. How to stop the abuse of power by the government? To provide relief for the infringed administrative counterpart is the problem that we have to face and solve. This paper intends to discuss from the following parts. Any study must have a clear understanding of the object of study, otherwise it will lead to a deviation from the whole research direction. There are many concepts related to abuse of power. The author chooses two concepts of discretion and administrative discretion. And introduced the current academic circles more inclined to use the concept of administrative discretion. Although scholars at home and abroad have different understanding of the concept, the author thinks this is not the key to the problem. Secondly, It is an empirical study on the current judicial cases of abuse of power in China. Through the statistical analysis of the data of the retrieved case samples, and the study of the statistical results, It is found from the data that there are still problems in judicial review of administrative abuse of power in judicial practice. On the basis of the study of the overall data of the above cases, the representative cases are selected for in-depth analysis. From the empirical point of view, it is necessary to observe the criterion by which the judge determines the abuse of power. Due to the judicial review of abuse of power, the problem of how to balance the judicial discretion and the administrative discretion is inevitably involved. This is also the crux of judicial review of abuse of power in our country. On the basis of introducing the development of administrative discretion, the author explains that the review of administrative discretion has become inevitable. But at the same time, there must be sufficient respect for administrative discretion. The value and danger of discretion coexist, Therefore, the boundary between judicial discretion and administrative discretion must be properly grasped. This paper tries to put forward some ideas for the judicial review of abuse of power in our country in order to promote the solution of the problem.
【学位授予单位】:北方工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周隆基;彭贵才;;行政裁量行为的司法审查——以《行政诉讼法》修改为视角的分析[J];电子科技大学学报(社科版);2015年06期
2 施立栋;;被滥用的“滥用职权”——行政判决中滥用职权审查标准的语义扩张及其成因[J];政治与法律;2015年01期
3 刘艺;;论我国行政裁量司法控制模式的建构[J];法学家;2013年04期
4 江必新;;行政强制司法审查若干问题研究[J];时代法学;2012年05期
5 孙启福;张建平;;行政滥用职权司法审查的检讨与重构 以法官的规避倾向为视角[J];法律适用;2011年03期
6 姜明安;;行政监管裁量权的法律规制[J];湖南省社会主义学院学报;2009年04期
7 何海波;;行政行为的合法要件——兼议行政行为司法审查根据的重构[J];中国法学;2009年04期
8 余凌云;;对行政机关滥用职权的司法审查——从若干判案看法院审理的偏好与问题[J];中国法学;2008年01期
9 郑春燕;;论“行政裁量理由明显不当”标准——走出行政裁量主观性审查的困境[J];国家行政学院学报;2007年04期
10 张千帆;;行政自由裁量权的法律控制——以美国行政法为视角[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年03期
,本文编号:1539973
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1539973.html