论法官的自由裁量权

发布时间：2018-02-26 22:39

本文关键词： 自由裁量必要性潜在问题规制　出处：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：孟子说，“徒法不足以自行，徒善不足以为政”道出了人的能动性对法律实施的重要性。法院作为实现社会正义的最后一道防线，法官作为这道防线的守门员，法官必须要忠于法律，依法履行职责，但由于法律存在局限性、法律存在冲突和漏洞等固有缺陷决定了严格适用法律将可能产生不公正司法，为了真正实现社会正义、确保司法公正，法官自由裁量权必然存在。自由裁量权的存在是必然的，但由于法官存在个体差异性和权力具有天然扩张性，加上我国法院体制建设及权力监督机制不健全等因素的存在，法官自由裁量权有可能被滥用，存在恣意和专断的风险，因而需要规范法官自由裁量权的行使。本文分三章进行，第一章是关于法官自由裁量权的概述，本章通过对人们在法官是否应该享有自由裁量权上所持的不同态度的分析，提出法官应该享有自由裁量权；通过国内外学者对自由裁量权含义的不同看法对自由裁量权的内涵进行界定；通过对自由裁量权的特性进行阐析，进一步认识法官自由裁量权。第二章分析了自由裁量权存在的必要性及其在司法实践中潜在的消极后果，通过对克服法律局限性、协调法律价值冲突等作用的分析，突显了法官自由裁量权的价值，存在的必要性；通过对法官自由裁量权的行使标准难统一、司法权有行政化、地方化倾向等问题的分析，阐明法官自由裁量权的潜在问题。第三章是本文的重点，规制法官自由裁量权的行使。本章分三个部分进行论述，第一部分从法官管理体制着手，通过法院管理体制在组织体系、经费保障体系、身份保障机制等方面的改革来确保法官独立公正地行使自由裁量权；第二部分从监督机制的健全进行规范，通过在规范人大监督权、完善新闻立法及加强公开审判制度等方面健全监督机制，使监督效用与裁量权的正当行使都得到保障；最后一部分则从法律方法的运用进行约束，通过阐述了法律方法与法官自由裁量权的关系，分析法律方法对自由裁量权的约束作用及法律方法在我国司法实践的运用现状，提出通过强化法官法律方法的运用意识，，促使法官自由裁量权合法规范、公正合理地行使。
[Abstract]:Mencius said, "the law is not enough for itself, and the law is not good enough for the government." Mencius pointed out the importance of human initiative to the implementation of the law. The court was the last line of defense to achieve social justice, and the judge served as the goalkeeper of this line of defense. Judges must be loyal to the law and perform their duties according to law. However, due to the limitations of the law, conflicts and loopholes in the law, the strict application of the law may result in unfair justice. In order to truly realize social justice, the judge must be faithful to the law and perform his duties in accordance with the law. To ensure judicial justice, the discretion of the judge must exist. The existence of the discretion is inevitable, but due to the existence of individual differences and the natural expansion of the power of the judge, In addition, due to the existence of such factors as the construction of the court system and the imperfect mechanism of power supervision in our country, the discretion of the judge may be abused and there is the risk of arbitrariness and arbitrariness, so it is necessary to regulate the exercise of the discretion of the judge. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the discretion of judges, this chapter puts forward that judges should have discretion through the analysis of people's different attitudes on whether judges should enjoy discretion; Through the different views of scholars at home and abroad on the meaning of discretion to define the connotation of discretion, through the analysis of the characteristics of discretion, The second chapter analyzes the necessity of the existence of discretion and its potential negative consequences in judicial practice, through the analysis of the role of overcoming the limitations of the law and coordinating the conflict of legal value. It highlights the value and necessity of the judge's discretion, and analyzes the problems of the judge's discretion, such as the difficulty of unifying the standard of the exercise of the judge's discretion, the administrative and local tendency of the judicial power, and so on. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, regulating the exercise of judge discretion. This chapter is divided into three parts, the first part from the judge management system, Through the reform of the court management system in the aspects of organization system, fund guarantee system, identity guarantee mechanism and so on, to ensure the judge to exercise the discretion independently and impartially; the second part from the supervision mechanism perfect carries on the standard, Through perfecting the supervision mechanism in the aspects of standardizing the supervision power of the people's Congress, perfecting the news legislation and strengthening the open trial system, so as to ensure the proper exercise of the supervision utility and the discretion, the last part is to restrict the application of the legal method. This paper expounds the relationship between the legal method and the judge's discretion, analyzes the binding effect of the legal method on the discretion and the present situation of the application of the legal method in the judicial practice of our country, and puts forward that the consciousness of the application of the judge's legal method should be strengthened. We should urge judges to exercise their discretion in a fair and reasonable manner.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】