当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

自媒体时代律师网络言论规制研究

发布时间:2018-03-01 02:23

  本文关键词: 自媒体时代 律师 网络言论 规制 治理 职业伦理 出处:《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:作为庭外言论的一种,律师网络言论近年来从"热闹非凡"发展到"乱象丛生"。我国2015年的《刑法修正案(九)》以及2016年11月正式实施的《律师事务所管理办法》和《律师执业管理办法》呈现出国家对律师网络言论严格规制的特点,伴随而来的是相关部门对律师管理权力的强化和干预措施的前置,对走入自媒体时代的中国,这不失为国家的理性选择,具有确立言论自由限度、预防律师职业风险以及维护司法公信力的正当意义。但在自媒体时代,法令应当维护律师网络言论的合理性并且确立网络言论规制的限度,警惕缺乏宽容的网络言论规制政策借助法律修订之名进一步扩张,否则会将律师网络言论限制在一个相对狭小的领域甚至让其"噤声",引发不必要的法治风险。我国未来律师网络言论规制之路,应当超越"规制"走向"治理",既注重律师网络言论的"治",更要遵循律师网络言论的规律而"理"。具体说来,借助互联网思维,认清律师网络言论可信度高和影响力大、单向性与片面性以及价值双面性等特点,将对互联网技术的宽容精神应用到律师网络言论治理;在法理方面,在区分律师网络言论不同类型的基础上,着重合理平衡言论自由与司法秩序之间的关系;在社会规则领域,寻求法律与其他规范整体性和体系性的整合应对,着重加强律师网络职业伦理规则的建设。
[Abstract]:As a form of out-of-court speech, In recent years, lawyers' online speech has developed from "raging" to "chaos". The Criminal Law Amendment (9) in 2015 and the measures for the Administration of Law firms (November 2016) and the Office of practice Administration of lawyers (Office of the Administration of lawyers' practice) were put into effect in November 2016. The law shows the characteristics of strict regulation of lawyers' online speech by the state. Accompanied by the relevant departments to strengthen the power of lawyers management and intervention measures in front of China into the media era, this is the rational choice of the country, with the establishment of freedom of speech limits, But in the era of media, the law should maintain the rationality of lawyers' online speech and establish the limits of the regulation of online speech. Alert to the lack of tolerance of the network speech regulation policy with the name of legal revision to further expand, Otherwise, the lawyer's online speech will be confined to a relatively narrow field or even "silenced", causing unnecessary risks of the rule of law. We should go beyond "regulation" to "governance", not only pay attention to the "governance" of lawyers' online speech, but also follow the law of lawyers' online speech and "reason". Specifically, with the help of Internet thinking, we should recognize that lawyers' online speech has high credibility and great influence. Unidirectional and one-sidedness as well as value and other characteristics, the tolerant spirit of Internet technology is applied to lawyers' network speech governance, in legal theory, on the basis of distinguishing different types of lawyers' online speech, Emphasis is placed on balancing the relationship between freedom of speech and judicial order, seeking the integration of law and other norms in the field of social rules, and strengthening the construction of professional ethics rules of lawyers' network.
【作者单位】: 重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目(12XFXO19)
【分类号】:D926.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 张永谊;;网络,并非法律的“真空”地带[J];群言;2012年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 贺卫方;网络言论与监督司法[N];法制日报;2005年

2 吴兰友;“IP地址做被告”应是好消息[N];人民法院报;2011年



本文编号:1549998

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1549998.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0ef63***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com