司法ADR研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 23:07

本文选题：司法ADR　切入点：委托调解　出处：《复旦大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法ADR对于降低当事人的诉讼成本、减少当事人之间的对抗、节约国家司法资源以及缓解诉讼迟延具有重要意义。虽然我国一些法院对司法ADR进行了大胆的实践并取得了积极的成果,但是这些探索仍然是初步的自发状态,缺乏统一的制度框架和操作流程,在理论制度层面还需要论证,因此有必要加强对这一制度的研究。本文以司法ADR为主要的研究对象,通过对司法ADR制度性质、特征、功能等一系列基本问题的考察,意图在比较其他国家和地区的相关制度,总结我国现有的试点模式的基础上,归纳出可行的模式和操作流程,对未来该制度的构建有所帮助。本文共分为四章。在第一章中,首先对司法ADR的概念及基本特征进行了界定,即附设在法院内部的一种诉讼外的纠纷解决机制,同时又与诉讼程序存在着某种程度的关联,或是诉讼程序的一部分,是一种准司法性质的程序。接着,分别对司法ADR性质、功能做了分析。在第二章中,对两大法系代表性国家和地区的司法ADR做了系统的介绍,通过对国外和台湾地区司法ADR的制度设计及运作状况进行分析,以期对我国的司法ADR制度构建与完善起到一定借鉴作用。在第三章中,考察了我国司法ADR的立法与实践现状,并对我国司法ADR存在的问题并进行了分析,为我国司法ADR制度的构建与完善提供理论及实践依据。在第四章中,通过前面的分析,提出了构建我国司法ADR制度要遵循的三个原则,并针对我国立法及实践中存在的问题,对我国司法ADR制度建构与完善提出了设想,包括立法、受案范围、任职资格、程序设置等各个方面。
[Abstract]:Judicial ADR can reduce the litigant's litigation cost and reduce the confrontation between the parties. It is of great significance to save national judicial resources and alleviate the delay in litigation. Although some courts of our country have carried out bold practice on judicial ADR and achieved positive results, these explorations are still preliminary spontaneous. It is necessary to strengthen the research on this system because of the lack of a unified institutional framework and operation process, so it is necessary to strengthen the research on this system. This paper takes judicial ADR as the main research object, through the analysis of the nature and characteristics of judicial ADR system, On the basis of comparing the relevant systems of other countries and regions and summing up the existing pilot models in our country, the author concludes the feasible mode and operation flow, which is helpful to the construction of the system in the future. This paper is divided into four chapters. In the first chapter, the concept and basic characteristics of judicial ADR are defined, that is, a kind of dispute settlement mechanism attached to the court, and at the same time, there is a certain degree of connection with the litigation procedure. Or part of the procedure is a quasi-judicial procedure. Then, the author analyzes the nature and function of judicial ADR. In the second chapter, the author makes a systematic introduction to the judicial ADR of the representative countries and regions of the two major legal systems, and analyzes the system design and operation of the judicial ADR in foreign countries and Taiwan. In order to our country's judicial ADR system construction and perfection play a certain reference role. In the third chapter, the author reviews the current situation of legislation and practice of judicial ADR in China, analyzes the existing problems of judicial ADR in China, and provides theoretical and practical basis for the construction and improvement of judicial ADR system in China. In Chapter 4th, through the previous analysis, the author puts forward three principles to be followed in the construction of judicial ADR system in our country. Aiming at the problems existing in the legislation and practice of our country, the author puts forward some tentative ideas for the construction and perfection of the judicial ADR system in China, including legislation. Acceptance of the case, qualifications, procedures and other aspects.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】