四川省D市刑事法律援助状况调研报告
发布时间:2018-03-09 20:35
本文选题:刑事法律援助 切入点:机构 出处:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:我国刑事法律援助制度发展至今已有二十余年。它在保障公民权利方面起到了一定的积极作用,但是在刑事法律实践过程中也暴露了一些不足和缺陷。本文以四川省D市刑事法律援助为调研对象,从法律援助的机构设置与队伍状况、援助对象、援助经费、援助质量四个方面,,考察其现状,分别分析存在的问题及其原因,并提出相应的完善建议。 本文除引言外,正文共分为四个部分。 第一部分对D市法律援助机构与队伍进行调研及分析。D市刑事法律援助机构与队伍存在的主要问题是:机构设置不完备,机构编制不足,专职法律援助工作者缺乏。这些问题存在的主要原因是:政府不重视以及政府各部门工作不协调。针对这些问题,应该从以下几方面进行完善:首先应提高政府的重视程度,完善机构设置;其次应加强各部门的合作,提高法律援助的社会地位;最后应优化法律援助的工作执业环境,建设专业化队伍。 第二部分对D市法律援助对象进行调研及分析。D市刑事法律援助对象存在的问题主要有:刑事案件比例小,刑事案件数量少,未成年刑事法律援助突出。这些问题的出现与D市的基本情况是紧密联系的,如:市民的法律意思淡薄,法律援助宣传不到位,D市经济欠发达。为此,应当提高法律援助的社会认知度,扩大法律援助的范围,加大对法律援助的宣传,同时还要加强对未成年人法律援助工作的关注。 第三部分对D市法律援助经费进行调研及分析。D市刑事法律援助经费存在的问题主要有:政府拨款不到位,援助基金不足;办案经费不足,补贴不及时。援助经费不足的原因主要有:部分办案成本高,经费使用的保障不足以及援助经费的来源渠道单一。鉴于此,应当首先确保政府的财政拨款及时到位,同时积极拓宽援助资金的来源渠道,并持续保证经费的来源数量和金额的稳定性。 第四部分对D市刑事法律援助质量进行调研分析。D市刑事法律援助质量存在的问题主要有:无罪辩护意见采纳率低,案件满意度偏低。法律援助质量不高的原因主要有:律师水平有限,律师积极性不高,质量监管机制不健全。针对以上问题,首先应制定法律援助质量考核标准,再构建资金人员管理机制,最后设立案件服务质量的奖惩机制以促进刑事法律援助制度的发展。
[Abstract]:China's criminal legal aid system has been developed for more than 20 years. It has played a positive role in protecting the rights of citizens. However, in the course of criminal law practice, some shortcomings and defects have been exposed. This article takes D City of Sichuan Province as the research object, from the legal aid organization setting up and the troop condition, the aid object, the aid funds, Four aspects of aid quality are reviewed, the existing problems and their causes are analyzed, and corresponding suggestions are put forward. In addition to the introduction, the text is divided into four parts. The first part investigates and analyzes the legal aid institutions and teams in D city. The main problems of the criminal legal aid institutions and teams in D city are: the establishment of the institutions is not complete and the establishment of the institutions is insufficient. There is a shortage of full-time legal aid workers. The main reasons for these problems are: the government does not attach importance to it and the work of various government departments is not coordinated. In view of these problems, the following aspects should be improved: first of all, the government should pay more attention to these problems. Secondly, we should strengthen the cooperation of various departments and improve the social status of legal aid. Finally, we should optimize the working environment of legal aid and build a professional team. The second part investigates and analyzes the object of legal aid in D city. The main problems of the object of criminal legal aid in D city are as follows: the proportion of criminal cases is small, the number of criminal cases is small, the number of criminal cases is small. The emergence of these problems is closely related to the basic situation of city D, such as the weak legal meaning of the citizens, the lack of legal aid publicity and the underdevelopment of the economy of the city. We should improve the social awareness of legal aid, expand the scope of legal aid, increase the publicity of legal aid, and at the same time, strengthen the attention to the work of legal aid for minors. The third part investigates and analyzes the legal aid funds of D city. The main problems of the criminal legal aid funds in D city are: the government funds are not in place, the aid funds are insufficient, and the funds for handling cases are insufficient. Subsidies are not timely. The main reasons for the lack of aid funds are: the high cost of some cases, the insufficient guarantee of the use of funds, and the single source of aid funds. In view of this, we should first ensure that the government's financial allocations are in place in a timely manner. At the same time, we should actively broaden the sources of aid funds, and continue to ensure the stability of the sources and the amount of funds. Part 4th investigates and analyzes the quality of criminal legal aid in city D. the main problems in the quality of criminal legal aid in D city are as follows: the acceptance rate of innocent defense opinion is low, The main reasons for the low quality of legal aid are: limited level of lawyers, low enthusiasm of lawyers, imperfect quality supervision mechanism. In view of the above problems, first of all, the quality assessment standard of legal aid should be formulated. Finally, the mechanism of reward and punishment of service quality of cases is set up to promote the development of criminal legal aid system.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D926.5;D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 蒋建峰;法律援助办案质量控制思考[J];中国司法;2005年07期
2 肖沛权;;我国刑事法律援助制度改革若干问题探讨[J];中国司法;2011年05期
3 潘申明;刘宏武;;论刑事辩护制度的革新——以新《刑事诉讼法》为基点[J];法学杂志;2013年03期
4 李立家;;对我国法律援助发展趋势的思考[J];中国司法;2013年08期
5 ;2012年全国法律援助工作概览[J];中国司法;2013年06期
6 吉蓝玉;;我国刑事法律援助的困境与误区[J];今日中国论坛;2013年04期
7 左卫民;马静华;;刑事法律援助改革试点之实证研究——基于D县试点的思考[J];法制与社会发展;2013年01期
8 贺海仁;;法律援助:政府责任与律师义务[J];环球法律评论;2005年06期
9 马明亮;法律援助:中国刑事诉讼制度发展的瓶颈[J];西南政法大学学报;2004年04期
本文编号:1590150
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1590150.html