法院对上下位法冲突处理规则的适用及其限度

发布时间：2018-03-20 04:28

本文选题：上位法　切入点：下位法　出处：《环球法律评论》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国法院适用上下位法冲突处理规则的实践有很多异常现象;这些异常现象与法律界对法院是否具有直接处理上下位法冲突的权力这一问题认识模糊有很大关系,同时也与法律对此规则及其适用机关规定不明确有关。法院适用上下位法冲突处理规则的实践蕴含着法院事实上拥有对法律法规进行司法审查乃至违宪审查的权力的内在逻辑,这也是造成有些人无法接受这一实践的原因。2004年最高人民法院《关于审理行政案件适用法律规范问题的座谈会纪要》在澄清认识误区以及促进法院对上下位法冲突处理规则的适用等方面发挥了非常积极的作用,但由于法律规定本身仍不明确,并且法院直接适用此规则经常要面临较大的政治和法律压力,这就使得法院要全面实现对此规则适用的正常化并不容易。
[Abstract]:There are many abnormal phenomena in the practice of Chinese courts applying the rules of dealing with conflicts of upper and lower laws, which are closely related to the vague understanding of whether the courts have the power to deal directly with the conflicts of the upper and lower laws. At the same time, it also has something to do with the unclear regulation of this rule and its applicable organ by law. The practice of the court applying the rules of conflict of law to the upper and lower level implies the inherent logic that the court in fact has the power to conduct judicial review and even the review of unconstitutional laws and regulations. This is also the reason why some people can not accept this practice. On 2004, the Supreme people's Court's Symposium Summary on the Application of legal norms in Administrative cases clarified the misunderstanding and promoted the court to strike at the upper and lower levels of law. The application of the rules of sudden handling has played a very positive role. However, the law itself is still unclear, and the direct application of the rule by the court often faces great political and legal pressure, which makes it difficult for the court to normalize the application of the rule.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】