调解制度构建新论

发布时间：2018-03-21 09:56

本文选题：概念　切入点：主体　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：就中国司法体制而言,调解是一个高频词汇,无论是对司法制度建构具有决定性推动力的公权主体如立法、司法、行政部门而言,还是作为制度利用者的私权主体而言,调解似乎为每一个利益相关方都提供了可资利用并借以实现其主体价值目标的资源和机会。但就规范论意义而言,一种具有迎合多重主体价值追求的泛社会化概念及其制度设计,其法律实效是值得怀疑的,因为调解作为一种被赋予重要的司法功能的产物,如果仅仅因为它本身具有的先验的经验性和传统“优势”,仅仅因为它恰恰暗合了现行司法体制改革脱困的应急之需,就认为当下就调解展开的热烈讨论和积极立法活动可以直接与建设性或有效性划等号是远远不够的。事实上,一种新的制度或该制度背后价值体系的稳妥建构往往依赖的是理论建构与实践目标的恰当平衡。正是基于这一点,笔者以为,调解要成为多元化纠纷解决机制的重要组成部分,发挥制度规范功能,必须对现有的调解基础理论进行梳理和检讨,重构调解的制度内涵。为此本文主要从调解概念重塑与定位;调解主体构成的反思与检讨;调解程序与规则研究;调解效力刍议等四大方面对调解制度的法律化、规范化进行讨论,并在此基础上提出初步构想,以期建设规范论意义上的调解制度,实现从传统混杂的道德性调解向新式、简便、规范的法律性调解制度建构的转变,在保留调解制度多样、灵活、简便优点的同时,提升调解制度的规范性和司法功能,实现诉讼、仲裁之外第三条建设性司法路径的建构。
[Abstract]:As far as China's judicial system is concerned, mediation is a high-frequency word, whether it is the subject of public rights that has a decisive impetus to the construction of the judicial system, such as legislation, judicature, administrative department, or the subject of private rights as the user of the system. Mediation seems to provide each stakeholder with the resources and opportunities available to it to achieve its subjective value goals... but in the normative sense, The legal effectiveness of a pan-socialized concept and its system design, which caters to the pursuit of multi-subject value, is doubtful, because mediation is the product of an important judicial function. If it merely because of its own transcendental experience and traditional "advantages," simply because it is precisely the current judicial system reform to extricate the emergency needs, It is not enough to think that the lively discussion and active legislative activity on mediation at present can be directly equated with constructive or effective. In fact, A new system or the sound construction of the value system often depends on the proper balance between the theoretical construction and the practical goal. Based on this, the author thinks that if mediation is to become an important part of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism and to play a normative role in the system, it is necessary to comb and review the existing basic theory of mediation. For this reason, this paper mainly reconstructs and orientates the concept of mediation, rethinking and reviewing the composition of the subject of mediation, studying the procedure and rules of mediation, discussing the effectiveness of mediation and legalizing the mediation system. On the basis of the discussion of standardization, this paper puts forward a preliminary conception to construct the mediation system in the sense of normative theory, and to realize the transformation from the traditional mixed moral mediation to the new, simple and standardized legal mediation system. While retaining the advantages of diverse, flexible and simple mediation system, we should enhance the normative and judicial functions of the mediation system, and realize the construction of the third constructive judicial path beyond litigation and arbitration.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】