陪审制研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 19:47

本文选题：陪审制　切入点：陪审团　出处：《广西师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在法律界中,陪审制度一直是一个受到关注和激烈争论的制度。陪审制源于英国,在美国发展壮大,并影响着世界各国。而法国与德国也在引进陪审制后,通过较长时期的探索,设立了与大陆法系国家相适应的参审制。虽然近几年来陪审制有衰落的趋势,但与此同时,俄罗斯、日本、西班牙等国家通过一系列的司法改革,都走上了改革和完善陪审制的道路。我国的人民陪审员制度在这种时代背景下,应该树立鲜明的旗帜,必须做到与时俱进,与国际接轨,使人民陪审员制度更好地发挥其功能。笔者认为,现在否认陪审制的价值和存在意义还为时过早,继续保留陪审制是有必要的。本文首先对陪审制的历史沿革和现状进行一些简单的介绍,继而提出外国的相关经验以及对我国陪审制度的借鉴作用,最后对我国现行的人民陪审员制度的存在意义及其改革进行了思考,希望对我国陪审制度的进一步改革有一定的意义。
[Abstract]:In the legal profession, the jury system has always been a system of concern and heated debate. The jury system originated in Britain, developed in the United States, and affected all countries in the world. And France and Germany also introduced the jury system after the introduction of the jury system. Through a long period of exploration, the system of participation in trial has been set up in accordance with the civil law system. Although the jury system has declined in recent years, at the same time, Russia, Japan, Spain and other countries have adopted a series of judicial reforms. The people's jury system in our country should set up a distinctive banner against this background, must keep pace with the times, and be in line with the international community. In my opinion, it is too early to deny the value and significance of the jury system. It is necessary to keep the jury system. Firstly, this paper introduces the history and current situation of jury system, and then puts forward the relevant experience of foreign countries and its reference to the jury system in our country. Finally, the author thinks about the existing significance and reform of the current people's jury system in China, hoping that it will have certain significance for the further reform of the jury system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】