论非法证据排除规则对职务犯罪侦查的影响及应对

发布时间：2018-03-24 22:09

本文选题：非法证据　切入点：非法证据排除规则　出处：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：非法证据排除规则始创于美国,是对警察因侵权侦查而取得的证据予以排除从而达到制裁目的的权利救济手段,是保障人权与打击犯罪的平衡点之一。我国司法制度上存在重实体、轻程序的倾向,在法律制度上,尤其是包括证据制度在内的程序性法律上的立法欠缺给实践中带来不少隐患。在此背景下,2010年6月我国最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部及司法部联合发布了《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》(以下简称《非法证据排除规定》)以及《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》(以下简称《死刑案件证据规定》)。本文以我国非法证据排除规则的基本内容为出发点,分析该规则确立后对我国检察机关职务犯罪侦查带来的具体影响,并寻找原因、提出建议。本文除引言和结语外分为三部分。第一部分主要介绍我国非法证据排除规则的基本内容及特点；第二部分从检察机关职务犯罪侦查特点、方式及风险入手,分析规则确立后给职务犯罪侦查带来的各种具体影响；第三部分笔者从加强审讯策略培训、提升技术侦查水平、提高侦查人员程序意识、心理素质以及立法建议等具体方面提出应对非法证据排除的对策。
[Abstract]:The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence originated in the United States is the right relief means to exclude the evidence obtained by the police as a result of the investigation of infringement, so as to achieve the purpose of sanctions. It is one of the balance points between protecting human rights and cracking down on crime. There is a tendency in the judicial system of our country to put more emphasis on substance than on procedure. In the legal system, In particular, the lack of legislation in procedural laws, including the system of evidence, has brought many hidden dangers in practice. In this context, in June 2010, the Supreme people's Court, the Supreme people's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, The Ministry of National Security and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the provisions on the exclusion of illegal evidence in Criminal cases (hereinafter referred to as the exclusion of illegal evidence) and the Review and judgment of evidence in handling death penalty cases. The provisions of the question "(hereinafter referred to as" the provisions of evidence in death penalty cases "). This article takes the basic content of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence as the starting point, This paper analyzes on the concrete influence of the establishment of this rule on the investigation of crimes committed by procuratorial organs in our country, and finds out the causes and puts forward some suggestions. The first part mainly introduces the basic contents and characteristics of the exclusion rules of illegal evidence in China. The second part starts with the characteristics, ways and risks of the investigation of crimes committed by procuratorial organs. The third part is to strengthen the training of interrogation strategy, improve the level of technical investigation, improve the awareness of the procedure of investigators. Psychological quality and legislative suggestions and other specific aspects of countermeasures against the exclusion of illegal evidence.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3

【共引文献】