论能动司法的程序规制

发布时间：2018-03-29 11:13

本文选题：能动司法　切入点：程序规制　出处：《法商研究》2012年02期

【摘要】：为防止借能动司法之名违法办案,应该设定一系列规则,从主体、客体和内容几个方面对能动司法进行程序规制。在能动司法的启动阶段,享有启动权的法官应当依据案件的不同情况有选择地决定是否进行能动立法、积极司法、主动司法和有效司法。在能动司法的运行阶段,法官应该在当事人或控辩双方举证、质证的过程中,充分运用诉讼内外的方法和手段能动办案。在能动司法的决策阶段,法官应该针对不同的情形采用不同的决策原则:在疑难案件的决策过程中,坚持专家参与、分类解决的原则;在社会广泛关注案件的决策过程中,坚持社会评价和法律评价相结合的原则;在普通案件的决策过程中,坚持将能动司法作为实现公平正义可供选择的手段之一的原则。
[Abstract]:In order to prevent the illegal handling of cases in the name of active justice, a series of rules should be set up to regulate the procedure of active justice from the aspects of subject, object and content. Judges who have the right to initiate should selectively decide whether to carry out active legislation, active administration of justice, active administration of justice and effective administration of justice according to the different circumstances of the case. In the process of cross-examination, we should make full use of the methods and means inside and outside litigation to deal with cases. In the decision-making stage of active justice, judges should adopt different decision-making principles according to different situations: in the decision-making process of difficult cases, we should insist on the participation of experts. The principle of classified resolution; the principle of combining social evaluation with legal evaluation in the decision-making process of cases of widespread concern; in the decision-making process of ordinary cases, Adhere to the principle of active justice as one of the means to achieve justice.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;中南财经政法大学司法改革研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX085)
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】