论民意与司法的关系

发布时间：2018-04-09 07:10

本文选题：民意　切入点：司法判决　出处：《上海师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着中国法治建设的不断进行，民众的法律意识也在不断增强，对司法案件的关注也越来越多。诸多与司法裁判有关的问题日益浮出水面，不仅仅是法学理论界和法律实务界，社会各届人士都予以充分关注。在司法实践中，越来越多的案件吸引了各界人士的眼球，例如许霆案、云南李昌奎案等等，这些案件涉及到的案件事实、裁判过程以及判决结果无一不在触动人们的神经。通过对近几年争议性案件的分析，笔者发现，我国的司法实践和某些来自民众中的因素发生了千丝万缕的关系，也对司法实践产生了一定的影响，社会上一般将这一因素称之为民意。民意之所以与司法实践产生了如此复杂的关联，笔者认为大致有以下两大原因：其一，公民法律意识的提高，促使民众本能地关注司法案件；其二，近年来国家越发强调关注民生，要求人民法院最大限度地满足人民的司法需求，这是国家有意识地将民意与司法实践二者结合起来。由于厘清民意的内涵是一件非常困难的事情，而且民意是流变的，还存在真民意与伪民意之分，，所以在司法实践中面临的难题便是如何处理民意与司法判决的关系，这是司法无法回避的难题。一方面国家要求法院要更加注重保障民生，牢牢把握社情民意，真正认识民意，把人民群众的愿望和期待作为人民法院确立工作思路的依据；另一方面，司法审判应依法审判，法院应依法行使职权，独立审判，不受外界因素的影响。当二者产生冲突的时候，如何解决其中的矛盾，做到既依法裁判，又保障裁判结果的可接受性，这是当前我国司法实践急需解决的问题。在本文中，笔者通过对司法实践中的争议性案件的分析，引出本文的主题“民意和司法的关系”，并通过梳理概念，分析民意对司法的积极与消极影响，从而提出二者应建立一种协调关系。司法应吸纳民意，但是应该通过合法渠道，避免民意对司法裁判的不正当干预。
[Abstract]:With the development of the rule of law in China, people's legal consciousness is increasing, and more and more attention has been paid to judicial cases.Many problems related to the administration of justice come to the surface day by day, not only in the field of legal theory and practice, but also in all sections of the society.In judicial practice, more and more cases have attracted the attention of people from all walks of life, such as Xu Ting case, Yunnan Li Changkui case and so on.Based on the analysis of controversial cases in recent years, the author finds that the judicial practice in our country is closely related to some factors from the public, and it also has a certain influence on the judicial practice.Society generally refers to this factor as public opinion.The reason why public opinion and judicial practice have such a complex connection, I think there are two main reasons: first, the increase of citizens' legal awareness, urge the public instinctively to pay attention to judicial cases; second,In recent years, the country pays more and more attention to the people's livelihood and requires the people's court to satisfy the people's judicial needs to the maximum extent. This is a conscious combination of public opinion and judicial practice.Since it is very difficult to clarify the meaning of public opinion, and because public opinion is changing and there is still a distinction between real and false public opinion, the problem in judicial practice is how to deal with the relationship between public opinion and judicial decisions.This is a difficult problem that the judiciary cannot avoid.On the one hand, the state requires the court to pay more attention to safeguarding the people's livelihood, firmly grasp the social situation and public opinion, truly understand the public opinion, and regard the wishes and expectations of the people as the basis for the people's court to establish its working mentality; on the other hand, the judicial trial should be tried according to law.The court should exercise its functions and powers according to law and try independently without the influence of external factors.When the two conflicts arise, how to solve the contradiction and ensure the acceptability of the adjudication result according to the law is an urgent problem in the judicial practice of our country.In this paper, through the analysis of controversial cases in judicial practice, the author leads to the theme of this article, "the relationship between public opinion and justice", and through combing the concept, analyzes the positive and negative influence of public opinion on the administration of justice.Therefore, it is suggested that a kind of coordination relationship should be established between the two.The judicature should absorb public opinion, but should avoid the improper interference of public opinion to the administration of justice through legal channels.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】