当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

群体诉讼中律师风险代理制度研究

发布时间:2018-04-17 04:09

  本文选题:风险代理 + 群体诉讼 ; 参考:《华北电力大学(北京)》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国现阶段正处于社会转型时期,社会矛盾比较突出,群体性纠纷层出不穷,如何调动律师的积极性使其在群体纠纷的解决中充分发挥作用,如何通过正常的司法救济途径解决群体性纠纷,维护社会的公平与正义,是我们这个社会亟待解决的问题。所以,在涉及众多人利益而且运作复杂的群体诉讼中,律师风险代理制度逐渐成为理论界和实务界关注的一大焦点。虽然该制度的适用会产生一定的问题,但是对于群体诉讼而言,它有着不同于常规律师收费制度的独特价值,发挥着不可替代的作用。因此,越来越多的国家允许律师在群体诉讼中实行风险代理,并制定相关的措施解决该制度所带来的问题。我国目前仍然禁止该制度在群体诉讼中的适用,严重打击了律师参与群体诉讼的积极性,阻碍了公民寻求司法救济,不利于群体纠纷的解决和社会的稳定,从而引起了学界、律师界以及公众的不满。本文运用了案例分析法、比较分析法、文献资料分析等多种研究方法,从风险代理制度的概念特征入手,详细介绍了国外群体诉讼中比较有代表性的两类风险代理制度模式,然后客观而深入地分析了该制度的价值以及缺陷,在此基础上,具体设计出了适合我国群体诉讼的风险代理制度,同时考虑了该制度在我国司法实践中可能会带来的问题,并提出了相应的解决措施。
[Abstract]:Our country is in the period of social transformation at the present stage, the social contradiction is quite prominent, the group dispute emerges in endlessly, how to arouse the enthusiasm of the lawyer to make it fully play its role in the settlement of the group dispute,How to solve group disputes through normal judicial remedies and maintain social fairness and justice is an urgent problem to be solved in our society.Therefore, in the group litigation involving the interests of many people and the complex operation, the lawyer's risk agency system has gradually become a focus of attention in the theoretical and practical circles.Although the application of the system will have some problems, but for group litigation, it has different from the traditional lawyer charging system unique value, play an irreplaceable role.Therefore, more and more countries allow lawyers to carry out risk representation in group litigation and formulate relevant measures to solve the problems brought about by the system.At present, our country still forbids the application of this system in group litigation, which has seriously dampened the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in group litigation, hindered citizens from seeking judicial remedies, and is not conducive to the settlement of group disputes and the stability of society, thus causing academic circles.Legal and public discontent.This paper uses several research methods, such as case analysis, comparative analysis, literature analysis and so on. Starting with the conceptual characteristics of risk agency system, this paper introduces in detail two kinds of representative risk agency system models in foreign group litigation.Then, it analyzes the value and defect of the system objectively and deeply, and on this basis, designs the risk agency system suitable for our country's group litigation, and considers the problems that the system may bring in the judicial practice of our country.The corresponding measures are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:华北电力大学(北京)
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.5;D925

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 王福华;;代表人诉讼中的利益诉求[J];法学;2006年06期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 祁科;[N];法制日报;2005年

2 本报记者 张有义;[N];法制日报;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 纪程瑶;集团诉讼中律师作用研究[D];上海交通大学;2007年

2 孙建荣;律师参与集团诉讼的价值功能分析[D];苏州大学;2008年

3 滕双春;律师风险代理收费问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年



本文编号:1761989

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1761989.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e62ed***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com