协同与进步:中国司法发展与特色社会主义法律体系建设的反思

发布时间：2018-04-19 13:33

本文选题：司法发展 + 法律体系　；参考：《河北法学》2013年04期

【摘要】：中国社会变革中,司法发展和法律体系建设遇到一个悖论:往往社会治理最需要法律和司法的地方,司法和法律提供的资源供给却是最短缺的。宪政或法治的视角不仅要审视权力运作的限制,更要考虑权力特性来运用好制度之力量。进入"后立法时代",法律体系建设不应仅强调"立法中心"的思路,更应考察司法发展对其建构的积极重要意义。在中国,司法嬗变和法律体系建设统一于国家政法建设生态和社会现代转型之中,司法自治不等同于司法独立,法官独立不等同于法官专业化,司法制度地方化也不等同于司法权行政化。以"协同"与"进步"的态度来看,中国司法发展和法律体系建设都是不断发展的,科学系统的法律体系建设是司法持续、正确和安全发展的基本保证;同样,司法实践的发展和进步也保障法律体系建设去"空洞化"和去"纯意识形态化"。
[Abstract]:In the reform of China's society, the judicial development and the construction of the legal system are confronted with a paradox: the social governance is often the place where the law and the judiciary are most needed, and the supply of resources provided by the judiciary and the law is the most scarce. In the "post legislative era", the construction of the legal system should not only emphasize the thought of the "legislative center", but also examine the positive significance of judicial development to its construction. In China, the judicial evolution and the construction of the legal system are unified in the ecological and social transformation of the state's political and legal construction, and the judicial autonomy is not equal to the judicial independence, and the independence of the judges is not equal. With the specialization of the judge, the localization of the judicial system is not equal to the administration of judicial power. With the view of "synergy" and "progress", China's judicial development and legal system construction are constantly developing, and the construction of the legal system of the scientific system is the basic guarantee for the judicial continuity, the correct and safe development, and the development and progress of judicial practice, too. We should protect the legal system from "hollowing out" and "purely ideological".

【作者单位】：西南政法大学行政法学院;中央司法警官学院警察管理系;
【基金】：河北省法学会2012年度法学研究课题《政府在中国法治建设中的优先地位和作用》(2012DF019) 2012年度教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目《网络传媒时代审判公开问题研究》(12YJC820045)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】