深化改革视阈下司法公信力第三方评估机制的检视与优化——以全国首份司法公信力第三方评估报告为镜鉴

发布时间：2018-04-20 03:09

本文选题：司法公信力 + 第三方评估　；参考：《法律适用》2017年15期

【摘要】：对司法公信力进行定性、定量的评估是有效提升司法公信力的先决前提,这有赖于司法公信力评估体系的科学构建。近年来各地法院纷纷试水司法公信力等各类司法评估,本文谨以全国首份司法公信力第三方评估报告为考察样本,对其他类似评估的相关要素进行规整,对司法公信力评估的"4W"——Why,What,Who,How——也即评估的科学性、指标的有效性、评估主体的权威性、评估方法的全面性等方面深入探讨。本文着重于评估理论模型的方法论研究,从辩证唯物主义的角度对司法公信力的构成要素深入剖析,采用统计学中的德尔菲法、层次分析法、频度统计法等确定指标,通过配对比较法确定相应权重,运用聚类分析法,结合心理学相关理论对测评对象、调查问卷的设计提出优化路径,并对司法公信力第三方评估的宏观制度提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:The qualitative and quantitative evaluation of judicial credibility is the precondition of effectively enhancing judicial credibility, which depends on the scientific construction of judicial credibility evaluation system. In recent years, local courts have been experimenting with judicial credibility and other judicial assessments. This paper takes the first third-party evaluation report of judicial credibility as a sample to regularize other relevant elements of similar assessments. The "4W" of judicial credibility evaluation, that is, the scientific nature of the evaluation, the effectiveness of the index, the authority of the evaluation subject and the comprehensiveness of the evaluation method, are discussed in depth. This paper focuses on the methodology of evaluating theoretical models, analyzes the elements of judicial credibility from the perspective of dialectical materialism, and adopts the Delphi method, the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the frequency statistics method in statistics to determine the indicators. Through the matching comparison method to determine the corresponding weight, using the cluster analysis method, combined with the psychology related theory to the evaluation object, the questionnaire design proposed the optimized path, and proposed the consummation suggestion to the judicial credibility third party appraisal macroscopic system.
【作者单位】：上海市第一中级人民法院;上海市杨浦区人民法院;
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】