我国人民陪审员的选任与管理制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 18:19

本文选题：人民陪审员 + 选任　；参考：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：人民陪审员制度试点改革正如火如荼地进行中,研究人民陪审员的选任与管理制度对于推进改革具有鲜明的现实意义。本文先从人民陪审员的定位入手,再对我国人民陪审员选任与管理制度作一梳理,然后对英美法系和大陆法系国家所适用的陪审员选任与管理制度进行分析对比并总结优秀经验,最后提出对我国人民陪审员选任与管理制度的优化建议。文章第一部分,主要明确人民陪审员的定位,包括角色定位和价值定位。论述人民陪审员的职责,包括依法按时参加审判活动、审阅案卷、参加案件的调查和调解、积极参加案件评议并对事实问题进行表决的实质性的职责和忠于宪法和法律,公正司法,秉公办案,遵守廉政纪律等形式性的职责。最后根据其职责讨论人民陪审员的角色定位和价值定位。文章第二部分,对我国人民陪审员选任与管理制度作一梳理。首先就制度现状作一检视,梳理从2004年到2016年有关人民陪审员制度的主要规范依据。其次就人民陪审员选任与管理制度存在的问题分别进行深入地剖析。选任制度方面主要是选任标准过严和选任程序不规范;而管理制度方面主要是缺乏专属管理机构、缺乏履职保障机制以及参审权利义务不明三方面。从法律制度层面到实际运作情况做一展开,为下文对策的提出打好基础。文章第三部分,分析域外陪审员选任与管理制度。首先解读英美法系国家是以陪审员平民化为主,侧重解决事实问题。其次解读大陆法系国家也是以陪审员平民化为主,既解决法律问题又解决事实问题。最后将两者对陪审员选任与管理模式进行对比,以此获得对我国人民陪审员选任与管理的启发与借鉴。文章第四部分,介绍人民陪审员制度的改革背景,立足实际,结合第一部分对人民陪审员的定位,第二部分所陈述的问题以及借鉴第三部分所谈到的域外经验,就我国人民陪审员选任与管理制度的优化提出对策,以此来保证这一制度健康有序地发展。
[Abstract]:The pilot reform of the people's jury system is in full swing, and it is of great practical significance to study the selection and management system of the people's jurors. This article begins with the orientation of the people's jurors, and then combs the selection and management system of the people's jurors in our country. Then, the author analyzes and compares the selection and management system of jurors in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and summarizes the excellent experience, and finally puts forward some suggestions to optimize the selection and management system of people's jurors in China. The first part of the article, mainly clear the positioning of people's assessors, including role positioning and value positioning. Expounding the duties of the people's assessors, including their substantive duty to participate in trial activities according to law, to review case files, to participate in the investigation and mediation of cases, to participate actively in case deliberations and to vote on factual issues, and to be faithful to the Constitution and the law, Fair administration of justice, impartial handling of cases, abiding by the discipline of clean government and other formal duties. Finally, the role and value orientation of the people's jurors are discussed according to their duties. The second part of the article, to our people's jury selection and management system to make a comb. Firstly, this paper reviews the current situation of the system, combing the main normative basis of the people's jury system from 2004 to 2016. Secondly, the problems existing in the selection and management system of people's jurors are analyzed in depth. The system of election and appointment is mainly too strict and the procedure of selection is not standardized, while the management system is mainly lack of exclusive management organization, lack of duty guarantee mechanism and unclear rights and obligations of participation in trial. From the legal system level to the actual operation to do a start, for the following countermeasures to lay a good foundation. The third part of the article analyzes the foreign jury selection and management system. First of all, the interpretation of Anglo-American law countries is mainly to jury populism, focusing on solving factual problems. Secondly, the interpretation of civil law countries is mainly jurors, both legal and factual issues. Finally, the author contrasts the two models of jury selection and management, so as to obtain inspiration and reference to the selection and management of Chinese people's jurors. The fourth part of the article introduces the background of the reform of the people's jury system, based on the reality, combined with the positioning of the people's jury in the first part, the second part of the statement of the problems and learn from the third part of the extraterritorial experience, In order to ensure the healthy and orderly development of the people's jury selection and management system of our country, this paper puts forward some countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】