比较法视野下的能动司法研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 14:03

本文选题：能动司法 + 司法能动主义　；参考：《广西师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：全文除导论和结语外共分为五部分,总的来说可分为两个大方面,第一方面,通过对西方司法能动主义的阐述,来和我国目前推行的能动司法做比较,力图较为完整的呈现能动司法兴起的缘由、发展的背景、中国体制下的独特内涵。第二方面,通过前文对司法能动主义和能动司法的比较,揭示当前中国的司法改革引入能动司法顺应了社会发展潮流,并重点分析能动司法在我国实行的现实危险以及其正面效能,同时,本文有针对性的提出了能动司法在我国实行的路径选择。第一部分,西方司法能动主义与中国能动司法的概念分析。本章节首先介绍西方司法能动主义的背景及各学者专家对其内涵的阐述,接着对中国的能动司法概念进行分析,主要从学界中、政治上和哲学层面上来进行论述。通过中西方的不同论述,以比较法的视野总结能动司法的独特内涵及特征。第二部分,西方司法能动主义与中国能动司法实行的现实原因。司法能动主义在西方的兴起主要是由于法律自身属性的限制、司法与政治的融合、以及对传统理论认识的深化,这些原因对我国的能动司法有重要的启示作用,我国不能单纯的参考西方的司法制度,应辩证的看待西方司法能动,走一条适合我国国情的能动之路。第三部分,能动司法的优势。最高院倡导能动司法理念,坚持走能动司法之路,是因为能动司法有助于强化法院的社会职能；能动司法的积极性有助于提高诉讼效率、降低诉讼成本；能动司法重视法官的作用,有助于实现法律与社会的公平正义。第四部分,能动司法所面临的风险。任何事物都具有两面性,能动司法也不例外,司法运用不当,就会降低司法权威；司法队伍的素质在一定程度上也制约着能动司法的效能；过分强调调解,也容易导致审判方式的偏离,可能会有违于能动司法的初衷；民众对传统法治理念的坚持也在一定程度上影响能动司法的施行。第五部分,完善我国能动司法的路径选择。本部分主要从制度方面来阐述能动司法,主张建立多元纠纷解决机制、司法保护救助机制、司法民主创新机制、司法监督指导机制以及公共政策转化机制,从此五方面来保障能动司法顺利施行。本文主要通过文献研究法、比较法对能动司法进行分析,在分析的过程中,从学者观点、政治倾向、哲学角度等全面阐述西方司法能动主义与中国能动司法的区别,通过司法能动主义带给我国的启示,在理论上对能动司法做系统性的阐述,希望对实践中的能动司法有所帮助和借鉴。
[Abstract]:In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into five parts. In general, it can be divided into two major aspects. First, through the elaboration of the western judicial activism, it compares with the active judicature that our country is carrying out at present. The author tries to present the reason, the background of the development and the unique connotation of the Chinese system. Secondly, through the comparison of judicial activism and active judicature, it is revealed that the introduction of active judicature in China's current judicial reform conforms to the trend of social development. At the same time, this paper puts forward the path choice of active justice in our country. The first part, the concept analysis of western judicial activism and Chinese active judicature. This chapter first introduces the background of western judicial activism and the elaboration of its connotation by various scholars and experts, then analyzes the concept of active justice in China, mainly from the academic, political and philosophical levels. Through the different exposition between China and the west, the unique connotation and characteristics of active judicature are summarized from the perspective of comparative method. The second part, the western judicial activism and the Chinese active judicial practice realistic reason. The rise of judicial activism in the West is mainly due to the limitation of the nature of law itself, the fusion of judicature and politics, and the deepening of the traditional theory. These reasons have important enlightenments to the active judicature in our country. Our country can't simply refer to the western judicial system, we should treat the western judicial initiative dialectically and take a dynamic road suitable for our country's national conditions. The third part, the advantage of active justice. The Supreme Court advocates the idea of active justice, insists on the road of active justice, because active justice helps to strengthen the social function of the court, the initiative of active justice helps to improve the efficiency of litigation and reduce the cost of litigation. Active justice attaches importance to the role of judges, which helps to realize the fairness and justice of law and society. The fourth part, active justice faces the risk. Anything has two sides, the active judicature is no exception, if the judicature is not used properly, the judicial authority will be reduced; the quality of the judicial team will also restrict the efficiency of the active judicature to a certain extent; too much emphasis will be placed on mediation, It is also easy to lead to the deviation of the way of trial, which may be contrary to the original intention of active justice; the people's adherence to the traditional concept of rule of law also affects the implementation of active justice to a certain extent. The fifth part, perfect the path choice of active judicature in our country. This part mainly elaborates the active judicature from the system aspect, advocates the establishment of the multi-dispute resolution mechanism, the judicial protection and relief mechanism, the judicial democratic innovation mechanism, the judicial supervision guidance mechanism and the public policy transformation mechanism. From five aspects to ensure the smooth implementation of active justice. This article mainly through the literature research method, the comparative law carries on the analysis to the active judicature, in the analysis process, from the scholar's viewpoint, the political tendency, the philosophy angle and so on comprehensively elaborated the western judicial activism and the Chinese active judicature difference. Through the enlightenment of judicial activism to our country, this paper systematically expounds the active judicature in theory, hoping to help and draw lessons from the active judicature in practice.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D916

【参考文献】