司法判决的正当性研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 21:09

本文选题：司法判决 + 司法权　；参考：《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法判决是指依照法律的要求来认定事实,合理适用法律来解决纠纷的活动过程。司法判决对事实的认定以及法律的合理适用要严格按照法律的规定,这是司法判决正当性的必然要求,司法判决的正当性有利于树立司法权威,防止司法腐败,也符合社会主义政治文明发展的需要。但是在实际生活中,司法判决的正当性受到各种因素的制约,比如网络舆论,大众意识,司法腐败。通过对我国司法判决正当性的现状进行分析,从而采取一些措施来确保司法判决的正当性。司法正当性的确保,对法院的司法权威和形象至关重要,对维护法律的尊严至关重要,对社会的稳定和构建和谐社会目标的实现也非常重要。本文通过比较、分析的方法,对司法判决的正当性研究问题进行了深入的分析。通过对现象的分析看到问题的本质,总结出产生这种现状的原因,最后针对这些原因提出可行的方法和措施。确保司法判决正当性的道路是漫长的、是艰辛的,我们还有很长的路要走。本文大约3万3千字,主要内容共分四章。各章的主要内容概述如下:第一章,司法判决正当性的概念分析。本章主要研究了司法判决、司法判决正当性的定义,并阐述了研究司法判决正当性的价值意义。第二章,司法判决正当性的判断标准。本章首先从司法主体、司法依据、司法逻辑推理、司法程序等方面对司法判决正当性进行界定。其次是可能影响司法判决正当性的其他因素,比如网络舆论对司法判决的影响,大众意识对司法判决的影响,司法腐败对司法判决的影响。第三章,影响我国司法判决正当性实现的主要因素分析。本章通过对收集的一些案例和数据并对其进行分析,总结出了我国现在司法判决正当性的现状,具体表现为司法判决缺乏说服力、司法判决难以执行、司法判决缺乏既判力、司法判决缺乏法律依据和司法主体资格难以服众。通过现状总结出我国司法判决正当性因素动力不足的原因,有法官制度不完善,司法不独立,判决书质量存在问题等。针对判决书质量存在的问题,有缺乏对案情事实较为完善的阐述认定和分析,说理不充分且不具有针对性,对法律适用的解释不够,司法判决缺乏严谨的逻辑分析和逻辑推理等几方面。第四章,提出确保司法判决正当性的主要对策。通过提升司法公信力、完善判决书制度,提高判决书质量、加强司法活动监督,保证公正司法、培养公民的法律意识和法治观念等。
[Abstract]:Judicial decision refers to the process of determining the facts according to the requirements of the law and applying the law reasonably to settle disputes. The determination of facts and the reasonable application of the law should be strictly in accordance with the provisions of the law. This is the inevitable requirement of the legitimacy of the judicial decision. The legitimacy of the judicial decision is conducive to the establishment of judicial authority and the prevention of judicial corruption. It also meets the needs of the development of socialist political civilization. However, in real life, the legitimacy of judicial decision is restricted by various factors, such as network public opinion, public awareness, judicial corruption. By analyzing the status quo of the legitimacy of judicial decision in our country, some measures are taken to ensure the legitimacy of judicial decision. The guarantee of judicial legitimacy is of great importance to the judicial authority and image of the court, to the maintenance of the dignity of the law, to the stability of the society and to the realization of the goal of building a harmonious society. Through comparison and analysis, this paper makes a deep analysis on the legitimacy of judicial decision. Through the analysis of the phenomenon, the essence of the problem is found, and the reasons for the present situation are summarized. Finally, the feasible methods and measures are put forward for these reasons. The road to justice is long and hard, and we still have a long way to go. This paper is about 33,000 words, the main content is divided into four chapters. The main contents of each chapter are summarized as follows: the first chapter, the concept of judicial decision legitimacy analysis. This chapter mainly studies the definition of judicial decision and the legitimacy of judicial decision, and expounds the value significance of studying the legitimacy of judicial decision. The second chapter, the judgment standard of the justice of judicial decision. This chapter defines the legitimacy of judicial decision from judicial subject, judicial basis, judicial logic reasoning, judicial procedure and so on. Secondly, there are other factors that may affect the legitimacy of judicial decision, such as the influence of network public opinion on judicial decision, the influence of public consciousness on judicial decision, and the influence of judicial corruption on judicial decision. The third chapter analyzes the main factors that influence the realization of the justice of judicial decision in our country. Based on the analysis of some cases and data collected, this chapter summarizes the current situation of the legitimacy of judicial decisions in China, which is manifested in the lack of persuasion of judicial decisions, the difficulty of execution of judicial decisions, and the lack of res judicata in judicial decisions. The judicial decision lacks the legal basis and the judicial subject qualification is difficult to convince the public. Through the present situation, the author summarizes the reasons of the lack of motive force for the justice of judicial decision in our country, such as the imperfection of the judge system, the independence of the judicature, the problems in the quality of the judgment and so on. In view of the problems existing in the quality of the judgment, there is a lack of perfect explanation and analysis of the facts of the case, the reasoning is not sufficient and has no pertinence, and the interpretation of the application of the law is not enough. The judicial decision lacks rigorous logic analysis and logic reasoning. The fourth chapter, put forward the main countermeasures to ensure the legitimacy of judicial decision. By improving the judicial credibility, perfecting the judgment system, improving the quality of the judgment, strengthening the supervision of the judicial activities, ensuring the just administration of justice, cultivating the citizens' legal consciousness and the concept of the rule of law, etc.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】