论我国民事裁判文书公开

发布时间：2018-04-30 13:17

本文选题：民事裁判文书 + 内容公开　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事裁判文书,是依法行使审判权的人民法院对民事案件审理后做出的具有法律效力的司法文书,是司法审判权的最终表现载体。民事裁判文书公开,在完善民事审判公开、加强司法权力监督、预防和遏制司法腐败、促进公平正义、提高法官整体素质以及促进民事司法改革等方面具有重要意义。由于长期以来我国的民事法律法规中缺少对民事裁判文书公开方面的专门规定,司法实践中民事裁判文书也一直处在不公开的状态,虽然现实中有些法院在理论界的争论中已经开始着手公开部分民事裁判文书,但是理论上的一些问题还有待厘清,实务中的有些做法还有待完善。随着我国民主法治的发展以及民事司法改革的推进,对我国的民事裁判文书公开问题从理论上进行梳理,从制度体系上进行构建成为必要。本文共计3万余字,前有引言,后有结语,正文分为三个部分,主要内容如下: 第一部分是民事裁判文书公开概论。这一部分主要论述了民事裁判文书公开的内涵、性质和渊源以及民事裁判文书公开的立法现状和实践情况。首先,厘清民事裁判文书的内涵,阐释民事裁判文书公开的形式意义和实质意义;论述裁判文书公开与审判公开之间的关系,深化对裁判文书公开的性质的认识,明确民事裁判文书公开属于审判公开的重要内容;叙述民事裁判文书公开的渊源,简要介绍相关理论发展和制度沿革。结合现行立法中关于民事裁判文书公开的有关规定,汇总有关理论综合评析。介绍实践中民事裁判文书公开的有关做法,总结好的经验,分析不足之处。第二部分是对民事裁判文书公开的相关理论思考。这一部分主要从价值论、功能论、比较法三个角度展开,阐述民事裁判文书公开的重要意义。首先,从价值论入手,深入分析民事裁判文书公开的价值构成、价值冲突及价值衡量。其次,从功能论出发,多方面多角度分析民事裁判文书公开的功能。最后,从比较法的角度,简要介绍两大法系关于民事裁判文书公开的有关理论和制度,以供借鉴。第三部分提出了构建我国民事裁判文书公开制度的系统构思。这一部分在总结前文的基础上,对构建我国的民事裁判文书公开制度提出了从公开的内容到公开的形式以及公开的制度体系构建的建议。结合民事司法改革主要是民事裁判文书改革的主要方向,主要从民事裁判文书公开的内容要素、形式选择、配套制度的健全以及相关问题的解决等方面展开构思,以求为我国民事裁判文书公开的规范化、制度化做出努力。
[Abstract]:The civil adjudication document is the legal effective judicial document made by the people's court exercising its jurisdiction according to the law. It is the ultimate expression carrier of the judicial jurisdiction. The publicity of civil adjudication documents is of great significance in perfecting the openness of civil trials, strengthening the supervision of judicial power, preventing and containing judicial corruption, promoting fairness and justice, improving the overall quality of judges and promoting the reform of civil justice. Due to the lack of special provisions on the publicity of civil adjudicative documents in our civil laws and regulations for a long time, the civil adjudicative documents have been in a closed state in judicial practice. Although some courts in reality have already begun to open some civil adjudication documents in the theoretical debate, some theoretical problems need to be clarified, and some practices in practice still need to be improved. With the development of democracy and rule of law in our country and the advancement of civil judicial reform, it is necessary to comb the publicity of civil adjudication documents in theory and construct the system in our country. The text is divided into three parts, the main content is as follows: The first part is the introduction to the publication of civil adjudication documents. This part mainly discusses the connotation, nature and origin of the publicity of civil adjudicative documents, and the legislative status and practice of the publicity of civil adjudicatory documents. First of all, clarify the connotation of civil adjudication documents, explain the formal and substantive significance of the opening of civil adjudicatory documents, discuss the relationship between open adjudicatory documents and open trial, deepen the understanding of the nature of open adjudicatory documents. It is clear that the publicity of civil judgment documents belongs to the important content of open trial, narrates the origin of the publicity of civil adjudicative documents, and briefly introduces the development of relevant theories and the evolution of the system. Combined with the relevant provisions of the current legislation on the opening of civil adjudicative documents, this paper summarizes the relevant theories. This paper introduces the practice of opening civil adjudication documents in practice, summarizes good experiences and analyzes shortcomings. The second part is the related theoretical thinking on the opening of civil adjudication documents. This part mainly from the value theory, the function theory, the comparative law three angles, elaborated the civil judgment document public significance. First of all, starting with the theory of value, this paper analyzes the value composition, value conflict and value measurement of the open civil adjudication documents. Secondly, from the perspective of function, this paper analyzes the function of open civil adjudication documents. Finally, from the perspective of comparative law, this paper briefly introduces the relevant theories and systems of the opening of civil adjudication documents in the two legal systems for reference. The third part puts forward the systematic conception of constructing the open system of civil adjudication documents in our country. In this part, on the basis of summarizing the above, the author puts forward some suggestions on the construction of the open system of civil adjudication documents in our country from the content to the form of openness and the construction of open system. Combined with the civil judicial reform is the main direction of civil adjudication document reform, mainly from the content elements of the open civil adjudication document, form choice, the sound of supporting system, and the solution of related problems, etc. In order to make the standardization and institutionalization of civil adjudication documents public in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.13

【参考文献】