我国大规模侵权司法救济机制研究
发布时间:2018-05-01 00:01
本文选题:大规模侵权 + 司法救济 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:在经济增长水平高速发展的今天,矛盾积聚、暴发现象日益明显,群体性事件的频繁发生,现代社会矛盾越来越复杂,其涉及的主体越来越广泛,牵涉的利益也越来越多元化。有权利必有救济是现代法治的基本要求,如何有效的对大规模侵权案件中的权利人进行救济,是目前研究大规模侵权的重中之重。针对大规模侵权,我国民事实体立法无据可依,司法程序启动困难。启动司法程序的,在实践中也面临认定侵权行为与损害结果之间的因果关系确有困难、现有的诉讼制度不能满足大规模侵权案件的要求,损害赔偿机制不健全等重重困难。国外在对大规模侵权司法救济机制上,部分国家已经形成了完善的诉讼形式和救济机制体系,但这些救济机制要么在我国难以发挥作用,,要么与我国水土不服,要么需要花费高昂的成本。一项制度不仅要与相应的社会环境相适应,而且要给广大权利人接近正义的机会,否则就形同虚设,没有任何意义,更加背离了制度设计的初衷。面对实践的迫切需求和理论上的空白点,完善我国大规模侵权司法救济,应在完善实体法律规定的基础上,树立司法最终解决理念。在具体制度设计上,应创新诉讼制度,引进诉讼信托,并确立惩罚性赔偿机制,以解决大规模侵权司法救济机制这一难题。
[Abstract]:Today, with the rapid development of economic growth level, the phenomenon of contradiction accumulation and outbreak is increasingly obvious, the frequent occurrence of group events, the modern social contradictions are becoming more and more complex, the main body involved is more and more extensive, and the interests involved are becoming more and more diversified. Relief is the basic requirement of modern rule of law. How to effectively remedy the obligee in the massive infringement cases is the most important task in the study of large-scale infringement at present. In view of the massive infringement, the legislation of civil entity in our country has no basis and it is difficult to start the judicial procedure. In practice, it is difficult to identify the causality between tort and the result of damage, the existing litigation system can not meet the requirements of large-scale tort cases, damage compensation mechanism is not perfect and many other difficulties. Some countries have formed perfect litigation form and relief mechanism system on the judicial relief mechanism of large-scale tort, but these relief mechanisms are either difficult to play a role in our country or do not agree with our country. Or it will cost a lot of money. A system should not only adapt to the corresponding social environment, but also give the broad masses of right holders the opportunity to approach justice. Otherwise, it is meaningless and meaningless, and deviates from the original intention of the system design. In the face of the urgent need of practice and the blank spot in theory, to perfect the judicial remedy of large-scale tort in our country, we should set up the idea of the final solution of the judicature on the basis of perfecting the substantive laws. In the specific system design, the litigation system should be innovated, the litigation trust should be introduced, and the punitive damages mechanism should be established in order to solve the problem of judicial relief mechanism of large-scale infringement.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱苏力;制度是如何形成的?——关于马歇尔诉麦迪逊案的故事[J];比较法研究;1998年01期
2 顾自安;;制度发生学探源:制度是如何形成的[J];当代经济管理;2006年04期
3 朱岩;;大规模侵权的实体法问题初探[J];法律适用;2006年10期
4 王强义;;论诉讼信托——兼析我国民事诉讼法第54、55条[J];中南政法学院学报;1992年03期
5 吴英姿;;代表人诉讼制度设计缺陷[J];法学家;2009年02期
6 肖建华;诉权与实体权利主体相分离的类型化分析[J];法学评论;2002年01期
7 宋亚辉;;消协在大规模侵权案件中的诉讼信托研究——基于三鹿奶粉事件的反思[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2010年01期
8 徐卫;;论诉讼信托[J];河北法学;2006年09期
9 文杰;聂毅;;诉讼信托的正当性与立法构建[J];江汉论坛;2008年09期
10 王玉青;;食品大规模侵权惩罚性损害赔偿的法律分析[J];理论月刊;2012年02期
本文编号:1826802
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1826802.html