论舆论监督与司法独立的关系

发布时间：2018-05-09 06:12

本文选题：舆论监督 + 司法独立　；参考：《郑州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：舆论监督指的是社会公众通过一定的形式,发表意见和建议,对涉及公共事务的组织和个人实行的检查和督促的活动。舆论监督的权利是公民知情权,表达自由的体现,社会公众有权对社会事务、国家权力的运行进行监督。司法权是国家公权力的一种,公众舆论对司法权的运行进行监督,对促进司法公正,防止司法腐败有着重要作用。舆论监督和司法独立在促进社会公平正义这一点上是一致的,二者的本应是相互协调,相互促进的关系。但是,司法独立要求司法权在一个相对独立的环境内运行,司法权的运行排斥任何不合法、不合程序的介入,舆论监督与司法独立在事实认定标准、立场和出发点等方面的差异使二者存在冲突的可能。在我国,由于舆论监督和司法体制的不完善,加上网络等舆论监督形式的复杂多变等原因的影响,使舆论监督与司法独立的冲突多有发生,舆论监督与司法独立之间的合理界限并未确立。本文分三个部分对舆论监督与司法独立的关系进行论述：第一部分阐述了舆论监督和司法独立的概念,阐明了舆论监督并不等于新闻监督,新闻监督只是舆论监督的形式之一,在我国,司法独立并不包括法官独立而仅仅是人民法院的审判独立,论述了舆论监督与司法独立应然的协调关系,舆论监督有其正当的权利基础,而且舆论监督与司法独立在追求社会公平正义这一点上是一致的；第二部分阐述了我国舆论监督与司法独立冲突的表现,从舆论监督与司法活动特征的差异性以及司法体制和舆论监督自身的不完善等方吾具体分析了二者产生冲突的原因；第三部分针对我国现实,提出了协调我国舆论监督与司法独立关系的建议,通过不断的理论探讨和实践摸索实现二者之间的良性互动,推动我国民主法治社会的建设。
[Abstract]:Public opinion supervision refers to the inspection and supervision of organizations and individuals involved in public affairs through certain forms of public opinion and suggestions. The right of public opinion supervision is the embodiment of citizens' right to know and freedom of expression, and the public has the right to supervise the operation of social affairs and state power. Judicial power is a kind of national public power. Public opinion supervises the operation of judicial power, which plays an important role in promoting judicial justice and preventing judicial corruption. The supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary are consistent in promoting social fairness and justice, and their relationship should be coordinated and mutually promoted. However, judicial independence requires the judicial power to operate in a relatively independent environment. The operation of the judicial power excludes any illegal and non-procedural intervention, and the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary are found to be standard in fact. The differences of standpoint and starting point make it possible for them to conflict. In China, because of the imperfect public opinion supervision and judicial system, and the influence of the complex and changeable forms of public opinion supervision, such as the Internet, conflicts between public opinion supervision and judicial independence often occur. The reasonable boundary between public opinion supervision and judicial independence has not been established. This paper discusses the relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial independence in three parts: the first part expounds the concept of public opinion supervision and judicial independence, and clarifies that public opinion supervision is not equal to news supervision, and news supervision is only one of the forms of public opinion supervision. In China, judicial independence does not include the independence of judges but only the judicial independence of the people's court. This paper discusses the harmonious relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary, and the supervision of public opinion has its legitimate right basis. Moreover, the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary are consistent in the pursuit of social fairness and justice. The second part expounds the manifestation of the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary. From the differences between the characteristics of public opinion supervision and judicial activities and the imperfections of the judicial system and the supervision of public opinion itself, the author analyzes the causes of the conflict between the two. The third part is aimed at the reality of our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions to coordinate the relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the independence of judicature in our country. Through the constant theoretical discussion and practice, we can realize the benign interaction between the two and promote the construction of a democratic society under the rule of law in our country.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】