人民法院高度组织化与民事诉讼程序的失灵

发布时间：2018-05-09 16:30

本文选题：法院 + 组织　；参考：《甘肃政法学院学报》2013年02期

【摘要】：法院在组织结构上与行政机关有着显著区别,在内部不应当采官僚科层制的结构,而应当尊重庭审法官的独立地位;在外部不应当有在权力序列中高于法院或者能够控制法院审判活动的任何权威。但是,我国的人民法院则正好相反:在内部,人民法院采官僚科层制的结构;在外部,有在国家权力序列中高于法院并能够控制法院的权威。人民法院内部的高度组织化,必然导致庭审法官缺乏独立地位,不能最终决定裁判的结果,从而庭审过程沦为走过场的活动。外部的高度组织化,则导致法院缺乏独立地位,从而使整个审判活动沦为具有表演性的仪式。人民法院内外环境的高度组织化,必然导致民事诉讼程序的失灵。而民事诉讼程序失灵的结果是纠纷解决的无序化,此种无序化反过来又进一步促进了人民法院的进一步组织化。要打破这种恶性循环,唯一的路径是还法院以应有的独立地位,进而还庭审法官以应有的独立地位,使法院真正成为遵循价值理性的履行审判职责之公共组织。
[Abstract]:The court has a remarkable difference from the administrative organ in the organizational structure. It should not adopt the bureaucratic hierarchy structure in the internal, but should respect the independent status of the trial judge. There should be no outside authority above the court or able to control the court's trial activity in the power sequence. However, the people's court of our country is just the opposite: inside, the people's court adopts the bureaucratic hierarchy structure, and outside, there is the authority which is higher than the court in the state power sequence and can control the court. The high degree of organization within the people's court will inevitably lead to the lack of independent status of the trial judge and the final decision of the outcome of the judgment, thus the trial process will degenerate into a formal activity. The highly organized exterior leads to the lack of independence of the court, which makes the whole trial a performance ritual. The highly organized environment inside and outside the people's court will inevitably lead to the failure of civil procedure. The result of the failure of civil procedure is the disorder of dispute resolution, which in turn further promotes the further organization of the people's court. To break this vicious circle, the only way is to return the court to its due independent status, and then to return the trial judge to its due independent position, so that the court can truly become a public organization that follows the value rationality to perform its judicial duties.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2;D925.1

【共引文献】