法院审判与公众舆论监督的冲突与平衡

发布时间：2018-05-16 13:44

本文选题：司法审判 + 公众舆论监督　；参考：《湘潭大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今中国，是关注司法的时代—其本质是呼唤司法公信力的时代，司法公信力的树立需要公众的认同，司法审判需要善意公正的舆论环境。但纵观司法实践，法院与公众舆论监督的关系却陷入了怪圈，面对公众舆论尤其是负面舆论，法院缺乏良好的应对机制，以至于在一些焦点案件中处于被动。司法审判与公众舆论监督产生冲突的原因有宪政方面的原因，也有评价基础上的原因，更重要的是司法审判离公众的司法需求还相差甚远。尽管司法审判与公众舆论监督存在冲突，公众舆论也存在自身缺陷，但应当看到的是，公众舆论对于司法审判有着积极的价值，公众舆论监督是司法公开化的客观需要，对于司法民主化进程起着促进作用，正是在公众舆论监督下，，促进了司法裁判法律效果与社会效果的统一。在正确认识与公众舆论监督的关系基础上，人民法院需要采取新的思路、措施促进二者关系的平衡，一是创新司法审判，实现与公众的互信，如了解当事人与社会大众的心理，满足公众司法需求，使司法具有亲民性。二是塑造合理的公众认同理念，实现个案公正与整体正义的平衡，实现裁判内容形式合理和实质合理的统一，实现裁判法律效果与社会效果的统一。三是实现与媒体的良性互动，应以宽容之心看待媒体监督，建立对焦点案件的释明机制，与媒体积极合作打造司法正面形象。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, China is an era of paying close attention to the administration of justice, whose essence is to call for the judicial credibility. The establishment of the judicial credibility needs the public's approval, and the judicial trial needs the public opinion environment of goodwill and justice. However, throughout the judicial practice, the relationship between the court and the supervision of public opinion has fallen into a strange circle. In the face of public opinion, especially negative public opinion, the court lacks a good coping mechanism, so it is passive in some focus cases. The causes of conflict between judicial trial and public opinion supervision are constitutional reasons, and there are also reasons based on evaluation. More importantly, the judicial trial is far from the judicial needs of the public. Although there are conflicts between judicial trial and supervision of public opinion, public opinion also has its own defects, but it should be seen that public opinion has positive value for judicial trial, and supervision of public opinion is the objective need of judicial openness. It is under the supervision of public opinion that it promotes the unification of the legal effect and the social effect of the judicial decision. On the basis of a correct understanding of the relationship with public opinion supervision, the people's courts need to adopt new ideas and measures to promote the balance between the two. The first is to innovate judicial trials and realize mutual trust with the public, such as understanding the psychology of the parties and the public. To meet the judicial needs of the public, so that the judiciary has a pro-people nature. The second is to create a reasonable public identity concept, to achieve the balance between the justice of individual cases and the overall justice, to realize the unity of reasonable content and reasonable substance, and to realize the unity of the legal effect and the social effect of the adjudication. Third, to realize the positive interaction with the media, we should treat the media supervision with a tolerant heart, establish the explanation mechanism of the focus cases, and actively cooperate with the media to create the positive image of the judicature.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】