完善我国多元化纠纷解决机制的立法问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 14:26

本文选题：多元化纠纷解决机制 + 立法完善　；参考：《西北民族大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：纠纷数量的急剧增长、类型的新颖多变是目前我国转型期社会的时代特征。这些现象的出现,直接导致了司法资源的紧张,引发了许多难题。为了应对这些问题,产生了各种纠纷解决方式,而保证这些纠纷解决方式体系化、制度化构建成熟的,则是多元化纠纷解决机制。为了保障建立起来理性的、可持续发展的多元化纠纷解决机制,必须通过立法对机制的相关规则和程序进行固化。本论文正是从这个角度开始论述的。第一部分,为了解决为什么立法的问题。对多元化纠纷解决机制本身的特征,以及这种特征对我国解决现实纠纷问题的作用进行了论述。引出了多元化纠纷解决机制立法的社会背景和法律价值。第二部分,描述美国、日本多元化纠纷解决机制的立法和运行情况,并介绍了英国的裁判所制度和德国的诉前强制调解制度。从这些论述中,找出对我国多元化纠纷解决机制的立法可供借鉴的内容,进行了分析说明。从中可以得到这样的结论,对多元化纠纷解决机制法制化已经成为共识,尽管各国具体的立法体例不同,但都体现了对人的自治选择权利的尊重,最大限度的发展可供选择的纠纷解决方式,实现机制的优化,保证纠纷的解决。第三部分,对我国正在运行的纠纷解决机制进行了评述,特别从立法的角度说明了目前我国多元化纠纷解决机制所存在的问题。并对这些问题进行了分析,结果认为存在着司法观念落后,缺乏社会资源投入;引导机制不健全,没有发挥应有作用;各种纠纷解决方式之间没有建立起有效的协调运行等原因。第四部分,针对上文所述的问题及其原因,论文提出了完善我国多元化纠纷解决机制的立法及解决方案。首先,从立法模式出发,认为全国人大应制定专门的多元化纠纷解决机制法,对多元化纠纷解决机制的构建提供法律保证。其次,通过对自治原则、多元一体原则、效益原则的分析,明确多元化纠纷解决机制法应符合的立法原则。再次,具体从常态化引导职能赋予各级司法行政机关,行政型纠纷解决方式的建设,鼓励律师参与纠纷解决,发展专门的纠纷解决机构等角度对多元化纠纷解决机制法的内容进行了设计。最后,论述了该法运行所应注意的配套制度。
[Abstract]:The rapid increase in the number of disputes and the novel changes in the types are the characteristics of the transition society in our country. These phenomena directly lead to the shortage of judicial resources and lead to many problems. In order to deal with these problems, a variety of dispute resolution methods have emerged, and it is the diversified dispute resolution mechanism that ensures the systematization and systematization of these dispute resolution methods. In order to guarantee the establishment of rational and sustainable dispute resolution mechanism, the relevant rules and procedures of the mechanism must be solidified by legislation. This thesis starts from this angle. The first part, in order to solve the problem of why legislation. This paper discusses the characteristics of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism and its role in solving the real disputes in China. It leads to the social background and legal value of diversified dispute resolution mechanism legislation. The second part describes the legislation and operation of the diversified dispute settlement mechanism in the United States and Japan, and introduces the system of adjudication in Britain and the compulsory mediation system in Germany before litigation. From these discussions, the author finds out the content of the legislation of the pluralistic dispute settlement mechanism in our country and analyzes and explains it. From this conclusion, it has become a common understanding to legalize the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism. Although the specific legislative styles of various countries are different, they all embody respect for the right of people to choose their autonomy. To maximize the development of alternative dispute resolution, to achieve the optimization of the mechanism to ensure the resolution of disputes. In the third part, the author makes a comment on the dispute settlement mechanism which is running in our country, especially from the angle of legislation, explains the problems existing in the pluralistic dispute settlement mechanism in our country at present. These problems are analyzed, the results show that the judicial concept is backward, the lack of social resources input, the guidance mechanism is not perfect, and it does not play its due role. A variety of dispute resolution methods have not established an effective coordinated operation and other reasons. In the fourth part, aiming at the above problems and their causes, the paper puts forward the legislation and solutions to perfect the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism in China. First of all, from the legislative model, the National people's Congress should formulate a special diversified dispute resolution mechanism law to provide legal guarantee for the construction of diversified dispute resolution mechanism. Secondly, through the analysis of the principle of autonomy, the principle of pluralism and the principle of benefit, it is clear that the law of pluralistic dispute settlement mechanism should conform to the principle of legislation. Thirdly, from the normalization of the guidance function to the judicial administrative organs at all levels, the construction of administrative dispute resolution methods to encourage lawyers to participate in dispute resolution, The content of the pluralistic dispute settlement mechanism law is designed from the angle of developing special dispute settlement mechanism. Finally, the supporting system which should be paid attention to in the operation of this law is discussed.
【学位授予单位】：西北民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】