长沙法院审理雇员人身损害赔偿案件的调研报告

发布时间：2018-06-27 01:10

本文选题：长沙 + 雇员　；参考：《湖南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国市场经济体制的完善和发展，雇佣关系以不同形式大量出现，同时也相应地产生了较多因雇佣引发的纠纷，特别是雇员人身损害赔偿纠纷的频繁发生，日益成为社会关注的热点问题。对2009-2011年长沙市九个区县基层法院及中院审理的雇员人身损害赔偿案件的调研表明，，近三年长沙市法院受理此类案件的数量呈逐年上升趋势。案件中的雇员大多是农民工，从事的主要为建筑、装修等行业；而雇主的种类呈现以自然人为主的多元化特征。案件的审理多以判决方式结案，判决中赔偿责任的主体也是多样的，对于人身损害赔偿金额、项目的认定也有其具体标准。安全保障意识和法律意识的缺乏、法律制度和保障机制的不完善是雇员人身损害赔偿纠纷不断的成因。在案件审理中存在对雇佣关系的认定及雇员职务行为认定的争议；在法律适用方面，《人身损害赔偿司法解释》第11条与《侵权责任法》第35条对于雇员或提供劳务者自身遭受损害的情形，在归责原则及具体适用上存在争议；而关于责任承担中的争议则体现在第三人致雇员受损时责任的承担方面。解决上述问题，关键要完善与雇佣相关的法律，围绕《侵权责任法》出台相应的司法解释，在司法解释中明确雇员人身损害赔偿责任的地位，建立法律框架以确立其基本理论，同时完善与雇佣相关的行业规范，最高法院也可制定与雇佣相关的司法实务规范性文件，统一司法尺度。健全雇主责任保险制度和合理的用工制度，同时要加强雇员和雇主的法律意识和安全责任意识，以期望保障雇佣关系健康和可持续发展。
[Abstract]:With the improvement and development of the market economy system in our country, the employment relationship appears in a large number of different forms. At the same time, there are many disputes caused by employment, especially the frequent disputes of compensation for personal injury of employees. Increasingly, it has become a hot issue of social concern. The investigation on the cases of compensation for personal injury of employees heard by the basic courts of nine districts and counties and the intermediate people's courts in Changsha City from 2009 to 2011 shows that the number of such cases accepted by the courts of Changsha City has been increasing year by year in recent three years. Most of the employees in the case are migrant workers, mainly engaged in construction, decoration and other industries; the types of employers are mainly natural persons. The trial of the case is mostly concluded by judgment, and the subject of compensation liability in the judgment is also diverse. For the amount of compensation for personal injury, the identification of the project has its specific standards. The lack of security consciousness and legal consciousness, the imperfection of legal system and safeguard mechanism are the causes of the disputes of compensation for personal injury of employees. In the trial of the case, there are disputes about the identification of the employment relationship and the recognition of the employee's duty behavior; In the aspect of application of law, Article 11 of "personal injury compensation" and Article 35 of "Tort liability Law" have disputes on the principle of imputation and the concrete application of the principle of imputation. The controversy about liability is reflected in the liability of the third party when the employee is injured. To solve the above problems, the key is to perfect the employment-related laws, issue corresponding judicial interpretations around the Tort liability Law, clarify the position of employees' liability for personal injury in the judicial interpretation, and establish the legal framework to establish its basic theory. At the same time, the Supreme Court can also formulate the relevant judicial practice normative documents and unify the judicial standards. It is necessary to perfect the employer's liability insurance system and reasonable employment system, at the same time to strengthen the legal consciousness and the safety responsibility consciousness of the employees and employers, in order to ensure the healthy and sustainable development of the employment relationship.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2;D923

【参考文献】