论我国检察机关的量刑建议制度

发布时间：2018-06-27 12:10

本文选题：检察机关 + 量刑建议　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：量刑建议制度自试行以来，就广受社会各界，特别是法律界人士的关注。笔者以我国检察机关量刑建议制度为题，系统论述了该制度各方面的问题。在文中，笔者首先简要介绍了我国检察机关量刑建议制度的发展历程，以此引出下文的具体论述。在正文中，笔者从以下三个部分进行了论述。第一部分，量刑建议制度概述。这一部分对量刑建议的概念、特征、其存在的理论依据和法律根据进行了论证，并着重论述了量刑建议制度在对提高我国刑事司法的公正性和公信力，增强检察机关的法律监督能力、提高诉讼效率方面的作用。随后，对量刑建议的操作原则和效力进行了阐述，我国检察机关的量刑建议原则包括依法量刑、罪责刑相适应、宽严相济和均衡四个方面，，量刑建议的效力包括启动量刑程序、制约量刑裁判和预设监督标尺三个方面。在域外量刑建议制度方面，文中对法、德、英、美四个国家的相关制度进行了考察，并对积极经验进行了总结。第二方面，是对我国量刑建议的实证分析，笔者首先立足法律规范对量刑建议的具体操作方法和程序进行了阐述，并结合实践案例对量刑起点的确定、基准刑的分析、建议幅度的比对及实施主体、提出方式与时机几个方面详细加以说明分析，尔后提出了诸如重视程度不够、量刑建议提出方式不规范、量刑情节事实调查取证不全面、没有明确的证据开示制度、建议内容缺乏应有保障、未建立特别量刑建议制度等问题，以引出下文对量刑建议制度的完善。第三部分是本论文正文的最后部分，主要针对前一部分对我国量刑建议制度的不足所做的完善建议。首先，提出了完善量刑建议运行模式，包括提高重要性认识和执行力度、规范提出方式和全面考察量刑情节；其次，提出了明确量刑建议证据开示制度，着重提出明确量刑证据开示的双向性义务、证据开示范围和开示程序；最后，针对量刑建议缺乏保障的实际情况，提出建立量刑建议保障制度，并秉着特殊问题特殊处理的原则，提出建立轻微刑事案件和未成年人刑事案件特别量刑建议制度的建议。
[Abstract]:Since the trial, the system of sentencing proposal has been paid much attention to by all walks of life, especially in the law circles. The author systematically discusses the problems in all aspects of the system of our country's procuratorial organs.
In this article, the author first briefly introduces the development process of the system of sentencing proposal in China's procuratorial organs, which leads to the specific discussion of the following. In the text, the author has discussed from the following three parts.
The first part is a summary of the system of sentencing proposal. This part has demonstrated the concept, characteristics, the theoretical basis and the legal basis of the sentencing proposal, and emphatically expounds the role of the sentencing suggestion system in improving the fairness and credibility of the criminal justice of our country, strengthening the legal supervision ability of the procuratorial machine and improving the efficiency of the lawsuit. Then, the principle and effect of the sentencing proposal are expounded. The principle of sentencing proposal in China's procuratorial organs includes four aspects: sentencing, crime, punishment, leniency and balance. The effectiveness of the sentencing proposal includes three aspects: starting the sentencing procedure, restricting the sentencing referee and the presupposition supervision scale. On the other hand, the relevant systems of four countries, France, Germany, Britain and the United States, were reviewed and positive experiences were summarized.
The second aspect is the empirical analysis of the sentencing proposal in China. First, the author expounds the specific operation methods and procedures of the sentencing proposal based on the legal norms, and combines the practice cases to determine the starting point of the sentencing, the analysis of the benchmark penalty, the comparison of the scope and the implementation subject, and the way and the time to explain in detail. After the analysis, we put forward the following problems, such as insufficient attention, non standard sentencing proposal, no comprehensive evidence for sentencing, no clear evidence system, lack of due guarantee and no special sentencing suggestion system, in order to lead to the improvement of the system of sentencing proposal in the next article.
The third part is the last part of the text of this paper, which is mainly aimed at the improvement of the deficiency of our country's sentencing suggestion system. First, it puts forward the operation mode of perfecting the sentencing proposal, including the improvement of the importance and implementation, the standard method and the comprehensive investigation of the sentencing circumstances; secondly, it puts forward a clear sentence for the construction of sentencing. On the basis of the introduction of the evidence system, we put forward the two-way obligation, the scope of evidence and the procedure of opening the evidence, and finally, in view of the actual situation of the lack of guarantee for the sentencing proposal, the establishment of a guarantee system for the sentencing proposal and the principle of special handling of special problems, and the establishment of minor criminal cases and minor criminal cases are put forward. Recommendations of the special sentencing proposal system.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.13;D926.3

【相似文献】