信息化条件下的审判公开研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 10:00

本文选题：审判公开 + 信息化　；参考：《宁波大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：审判公开作为现代审判制度的基本理念，是对审判权运行进行民主监督的一种制度安排，其核心是把审判活动置于阳光之下，让司法裁判经得起推敲、经得起检验、经得起评判，以公开促公正，以公正促公信，达到良性循环。在信息化浪潮的冲刷之下，，传统的审判公开制度正呈现出新的形态，焕发着勃勃生机。通过信息网络实现审判公开，是实现司法公正、提升司法公信力的客观要求，也是信息化时代背景下社会公众了解、参与、监督司法的现实需要。在当前这样一个信息化时代研究审判公开意义非凡。本文将从以下四个方面对信息化条件下的审判公开进行研究：第一部分为审判公开的基本内涵探析，拟解决审判公开的两个理论问题，即厘清审判公开的概念和探究审判公开的实质内涵，为下文分析问题、提出对策奠定坚实的理论基础。第二部着重考察了旁听、庭审的直播与录播、裁判文书的公开这三种传统审判公开方式，并从整体上梳理了传统审判公开存在的局限性。第三部分具体分析了信息化条件对审判公开产生的影响以及当前审判公开制度发展所面临的挑战与问题。第四部分针对当前信息化条件下审判公开制度发展所面临的问题，提出创设审判公开的网络新载体、搭建审判流程公开平台、排除裁判文书上网的恣意空间以及建立审判公开的救济程序这四点完善建议。
[Abstract]:As the basic concept of the modern trial system, trial openness is a kind of system arrangement for democratic supervision of the operation of judicial power. Its core is to put the trial activities under the sun, so that the judicial judgment can withstand scrutiny and test. Stand judgment, open to promote justice, justice to promote public trust, to achieve a virtuous circle. Under the tide of information technology, the traditional open trial system is showing a new form and full of vitality. Public trial through information network is the objective requirement to realize judicial justice and enhance judicial credibility. It is also the realistic need for the public to understand participate and supervise the administration of justice under the background of information age. It is of great significance to study trial openness in such an information age. This article will carry on the research from the following four aspects to the trial open under the information condition: the first part is the basic connotation analysis of the trial publicity, intends to solve two theory questions of the trial open. That is to clarify the concept of open trial and explore the essential connotation of open trial, and lay a solid theoretical foundation for the following analysis and countermeasures. The second part focuses on the three traditional ways of open trial, such as overhearing, direct broadcast and recording of court hearings, and the opening of judgment documents, and combs the limitations of the opening of traditional trials as a whole. The third part analyzes the influence of informatization conditions on trial openness and the challenges and problems faced by the development of open trial system. In the fourth part, aiming at the problems faced by the development of open trial system under the current information condition, the author proposes to create a new network carrier of open trial, and to set up the open platform of trial process. The four perfect suggestions are to exclude the wanton space of the judgment documents and to establish the public trial relief procedure.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】