非羁押性强制措施问题研究
发布时间:2018-07-12 15:44
本文选题:非羁押性强制措施 + 拘传 ; 参考:《太原科技大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国当下的司法实践中,非羁押性强制措施的适用比例非常的低。相反,“高羁押”、“变相羁押”的问题却一直存在。这一现象对保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权益、提高诉讼效益、限制公权力不合理甚至不合法行使是不利的。造成非羁押性强制措施适用比例低的原因有两个方面:第一是无罪推定、人权保护的思想未能很好地被大家所体会、贯彻,,非羁押性强制措施被忽视;第二是非羁押性强制措施本身在制度上还存在一定的问题,在一定程度上限制了其很好地发挥作用。 2012年新刑诉法对非羁押性强制措施的修改不尽人意,为促进我国的刑事诉讼的不断发展、加快法治文明建设,提高非羁押性强制措施适用率、不断完善非羁押性强制措施势在必行。我们应立足本国国情,科学地分析现在立法、司法实践中非羁押性强制措施存在的问题,在研究国外非羁押性强制措施优点的基础上来完善我国的非羁押性强制措施的适用。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial practice of our country, the application proportion of non-custodial coercive measures is very low. On the contrary, the problem of "high custody" and "disguised detention" has always existed. This phenomenon is disadvantageous to protect the legal rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants, improve the benefit of litigation, restrict the unreasonable or even illegal exercise of public power. There are two reasons for the low application of non-custodial coercive measures: first, the presumption of innocence, the idea of human rights protection has not been well understood by everyone, the implementation of non-custodial coercive measures are ignored; Second, there are still some problems in the system of non-custodial coercive measures, which to a certain extent limit their effectiveness. The revision of non-custodial coercive measures by the new Criminal procedure Law in 2012 is unsatisfactory. In order to promote the continuous development of criminal proceedings in our country, accelerate the construction of civilization of rule of law, improve the rate of application of non-custodial coercive measures, it is imperative to constantly perfect the non-custodial coercive measures. Based on our national conditions, we should scientifically analyze the problems existing in the present legislation and judicial practice of non-custodial coercive measures, and perfect the application of non-custodial coercive measures in our country on the basis of studying the advantages of non-custodial coercive measures in foreign countries.
【学位授予单位】:太原科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D925.2;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卞建林;;刑事程序法治化的期待——写在《刑事诉讼法》再修改之际[J];中国司法;2008年01期
2 金宏武;我国刑事强制措施的人权保障困境与出路[J];惠州学院学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
3 杨杰辉;;公正的渴求与资源的稀缺——略论刑事诉讼的经济效益价值[J];江西社会科学;2006年07期
4 陈瑞华;未决羁押制度的理论反思[J];法学研究;2002年05期
5 陈卫东,刘计划;英国保释制度及其对我国的借鉴意义[J];人民检察;2003年03期
6 陈瑞华;;刑事强制措施改革的新动向与新思考[J];人民检察;2008年24期
7 陈永生;刑事诉讼的程序性制裁[J];现代法学;2004年01期
8 余辉胜;;现行监视居住制度的隐忧与省思[J];西南政法大学学报;2007年06期
9 陈光中,张小玲;中国刑事强制措施制度的改革与完善[J];政法论坛;2003年05期
10 樊崇义;刑事诉讼法再修改的理性思考[J];政法论坛;2005年05期
本文编号:2117649
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2117649.html