传媒与司法之张力的法理分析
发布时间：2018-07-14 14:58
【摘要】：邓玉娇案、杭州飙车案、许霆案和刘涌案等社会热点案件突显出传媒与司法之间的内在张力。在对这些热点案件进行具体分析的基础上,我们可以把这些热点案件分为官民冲突案件、权贵身份案件、道德底线案件、社会民生案件等类型。司法机关及相关部门对这些热点案件的态度和方法与民众的权利诉求之间还存在着一定的差距。产生这一问题的原因,从实践层面上分析,主要有:传媒的自由和理性不足,司法机关没有真正独立。从理论层面上分析:既有言论自由及新闻自由与当事人获得公平公正审判权利的矛盾,又有言论自由及新闻自由与司法权及司法权威之间的矛盾。最后,借鉴国外的立法和实践经验,文章提出了我国协调传媒与司法关系应有的举措。
[Abstract]:Such social hot cases as Deng Yujiao case, Hangzhou drag racing case, Xu Ting case and Liu Yong case highlight the inherent tension between the media and the judiciary. On the basis of specific analysis of these hot spot cases, we can divide these hot cases into the cases of conflict between officials and people, cases of status of power and dignitaries, cases of moral bottom line, cases of social and people's livelihood, and so on. There is still a gap between the attitudes and methods of the judiciary and related departments to these hot cases and the people's claims. The causes of this problem are analyzed from the practical level: the freedom and rationality of the media is insufficient, and the judiciary is not truly independent. Theoretically, there are contradictions between the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press and the right of the parties to a fair and fair trial, as well as the contradiction between the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the judicial power and the judicial authority. Finally, drawing on the foreign legislative and practical experience, the article puts forward some measures to coordinate the relationship between the media and the judiciary in our country.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2122014
[Abstract]:Such social hot cases as Deng Yujiao case, Hangzhou drag racing case, Xu Ting case and Liu Yong case highlight the inherent tension between the media and the judiciary. On the basis of specific analysis of these hot spot cases, we can divide these hot cases into the cases of conflict between officials and people, cases of status of power and dignitaries, cases of moral bottom line, cases of social and people's livelihood, and so on. There is still a gap between the attitudes and methods of the judiciary and related departments to these hot cases and the people's claims. The causes of this problem are analyzed from the practical level: the freedom and rationality of the media is insufficient, and the judiciary is not truly independent. Theoretically, there are contradictions between the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press and the right of the parties to a fair and fair trial, as well as the contradiction between the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the judicial power and the judicial authority. Finally, drawing on the foreign legislative and practical experience, the article puts forward some measures to coordinate the relationship between the media and the judiciary in our country.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐珊珊;;浅谈我国新闻媒体自律机制的完善[J];法制与社会;2008年29期
2 周永坤;司法权的性质与司法改革战略[J];金陵法律评论;2003年02期
3 顾培东;论对司法的传媒监督[J];法学研究;1999年06期
4 贺卫方;传媒与司法三题[J];法学研究;1998年06期
5 徐迅;媒介的责任:将报道与评论分开——兼议报道及评论案件的新闻规则[J];人民司法;1998年10期
6 陈瑞华;;脱缰的野马 从许霆案看法院的自由裁量权[J];中外法学;2009年01期
7 景汉朝;传媒监督与司法独立的冲突与契合[J];现代法学;2002年01期
8 宋英辉;从刘涌案件改判引起的社会反响看公开裁判理由的必要性[J];政法论坛;2003年05期
9 刘斌;;让权力在阳光下运行——再论传媒与司法的关系[J];政法论坛;2008年02期
10 顾培东;;公众判意的法理解析——对许霆案的延伸思考[J];中国法学;2008年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 孙发;司法权威研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 张英霞;妨害司法权威典型犯罪研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
3 孙长春;司法权威的制度建构[D];吉林大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李炳烁;言论自由的法理学研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 袁佳;“媒体审判”问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
，本文编号：2122014
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2122014.html
