论反司法审查观的“民主解药”
发布时间：2018-08-06 15:43
【摘要】：反对司法审查的学者分别从规范体系、实证经验和因果关系的角度论证司法审查制度的不合时宜。在此基础上,他们提出通过民主来保障人权。虽然民主被官方所认可且有较强的可接受性,并在一定程度上被践行,但以民主观反对司法审查的论者并没有对民主进行清晰的界定,也没有对如何实现民主、如何证明民主的效用、实行民主的成本与收益提出建设性观点。他们理论试错的态度和行为值得肯定,但他们在反对把司法审查当作"最后一根救命稻草"的时候,有意无意地把民主也当作了"最后一根救命稻草"。
[Abstract]:Scholars who oppose judicial review argue that the judicial review system is out of date from the angle of normative system, empirical experience and causality. On this basis, they proposed to protect human rights through democracy. Although democracy is recognized by the government and has strong acceptability and is practiced to a certain extent, there is no clear definition of democracy by those who oppose judicial review in the view of democracy, and there is no clear definition of how to realize democracy. How to prove the utility of democracy and the cost and benefit of democracy put forward a constructive point of view. Their attitude and behavior of trial and error in theory is worthy of recognition, but when they oppose judicial review as "the last straw to save one's life", they consciously or unintentionally regard democracy as "the last straw to save one's life".
【作者单位】： 厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC820034):“转型期积极权利的法律保障研究” 中国博士后科学基金第四十七批面上资助项目及第四批特别资助项目的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D916
[Abstract]:Scholars who oppose judicial review argue that the judicial review system is out of date from the angle of normative system, empirical experience and causality. On this basis, they proposed to protect human rights through democracy. Although democracy is recognized by the government and has strong acceptability and is practiced to a certain extent, there is no clear definition of democracy by those who oppose judicial review in the view of democracy, and there is no clear definition of how to realize democracy. How to prove the utility of democracy and the cost and benefit of democracy put forward a constructive point of view. Their attitude and behavior of trial and error in theory is worthy of recognition, but when they oppose judicial review as "the last straw to save one's life", they consciously or unintentionally regard democracy as "the last straw to save one's life".
【作者单位】： 厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC820034):“转型期积极权利的法律保障研究” 中国博士后科学基金第四十七批面上资助项目及第四批特别资助项目的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D916
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 胡锦光;;论中国司法审查的空间[J];河南社会科学;2006年05期
2 刘星;重新理解法律移植——从“历史”到“当下”[J];中国社会科学;2004年05期
3 刘东亮;;我国行政行为司法审查标准之理性选择[J];法商研究;2006年02期
4 翟小波;;代议机关至上,还是司法化?[J];中外法学;2006年04期
5 王传丽;WTO协议与司法审查[J];中国法学;2003年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张彦，
本文编号：2168191
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2168191.html
