司法当贯彻权利优先于善的原则
发布时间：2018-08-18 15:49
【摘要】：“权利与善”的理论是伦理学的基本问题，它是义务论和目的论的分水岭。义务论主张权利优先于善，而目的论坚持善优先于权利。笔者通过对二者的比较分析，认为在司法领域应当贯彻权利优先于善的原则。目前，，中国司法的“病态”百出，其重要原因在于司法对善的考量优先于对权利的考量。因此，我国的司法目前亟需一剂“良药”，那就是坚持“权利优先于善”的原则，这要求在司法实践中对权利的考量要优先于对善的考量，个人权利绝不能受制于善的权衡和压制。只有这样，我们才能树立司法权威，确保司法独立，实现司法公正。 除了引言和结语外，本文的内容主要分为三个部分。 第一部分简要地阐述了权利与善的理论，对权利和善的概念进行了界定，并且对权利与善的纷争进行了梳理和评价，最后对司法中的权利与善进行价值排位，并将权利优先的理论引入中国的司法研究之中。 第二部分阐述了善优先原则所表现的病症，具体包括：民意审判、能动司法和“大调解”机制。此部分详细论述了三种病症产生的具体原因及所追求的善，这些善包括：公众目的、政治目的、经济效益和效率。同时指出这种“善优先”的司法原则所产生的弊端，包括侵犯个人权利、损害司法独立和强化人治等。 第三部分结合权利与善的理论，分析了中国的司法为什么应当坚持权利优先于善的原则，并且提出权利应优先于作为公众目的的善，权利应优先于作为政治目的的善，权利应优先于作为经济利益的善，权利应优先于作为效率的善。并且就如何确保权利优先于这些善，提出了相关的制度设计和规划。
[Abstract]:The theory of "right and goodness" is the basic problem of ethics, and it is the watershed between duty theory and teleology. The theory of obligation claims that right takes precedence over good, while teleology insists that good takes precedence over right. Through the comparative analysis of the two, the author thinks that the right should take precedence over the good in the judicial field. At present, the judicial "morbid" in China is mainly due to the priority of the judicial consideration of the good over the consideration of the right. Therefore, the administration of justice in our country is in urgent need of a dose of "good medicine", that is, to adhere to the principle of "right taking precedence over good", which requires that the consideration of rights should take precedence over the consideration of good in judicial practice. Individual rights must not be subject to good weighing and suppression. Only in this way can we establish judicial authority, ensure judicial independence and realize judicial justice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the content of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part briefly expounds the theory of right and good, defines the concept of right and goodness, combs and evaluates the dispute between right and good, and finally ranks the value of right and good in the judicature. And introduce the theory of right priority into the judicial research of China. The second part describes the symptoms of the principle of good priority, including: public opinion trial, active justice and "great mediation" mechanism. This part discusses in detail the specific causes of the three diseases and the pursuit of good, including: public purposes, political purposes, economic benefits and efficiency. At the same time, it points out the malpractice of the judicial principle of "good first", including infringing individual rights, harming judicial independence and strengthening the rule of man. The third part, combining the theory of right and good, analyzes why Chinese judicature should insist on the principle that right takes precedence over good, and puts forward that right should take precedence over good as public purpose, and right should take precedence over good as political purpose. Rights should take precedence over good as economic interests, and rights should take precedence over good as efficiency. And how to ensure that rights take precedence over these good, put forward the relevant system design and planning.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2189942
[Abstract]:The theory of "right and goodness" is the basic problem of ethics, and it is the watershed between duty theory and teleology. The theory of obligation claims that right takes precedence over good, while teleology insists that good takes precedence over right. Through the comparative analysis of the two, the author thinks that the right should take precedence over the good in the judicial field. At present, the judicial "morbid" in China is mainly due to the priority of the judicial consideration of the good over the consideration of the right. Therefore, the administration of justice in our country is in urgent need of a dose of "good medicine", that is, to adhere to the principle of "right taking precedence over good", which requires that the consideration of rights should take precedence over the consideration of good in judicial practice. Individual rights must not be subject to good weighing and suppression. Only in this way can we establish judicial authority, ensure judicial independence and realize judicial justice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the content of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part briefly expounds the theory of right and good, defines the concept of right and goodness, combs and evaluates the dispute between right and good, and finally ranks the value of right and good in the judicature. And introduce the theory of right priority into the judicial research of China. The second part describes the symptoms of the principle of good priority, including: public opinion trial, active justice and "great mediation" mechanism. This part discusses in detail the specific causes of the three diseases and the pursuit of good, including: public purposes, political purposes, economic benefits and efficiency. At the same time, it points out the malpractice of the judicial principle of "good first", including infringing individual rights, harming judicial independence and strengthening the rule of man. The third part, combining the theory of right and good, analyzes why Chinese judicature should insist on the principle that right takes precedence over good, and puts forward that right should take precedence over good as public purpose, and right should take precedence over good as political purpose. Rights should take precedence over good as economic interests, and rights should take precedence over good as efficiency. And how to ensure that rights take precedence over these good, put forward the relevant system design and planning.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贾中海;;正当与善——桑德尔对罗尔斯“正当优先于善”的批判[J];北方论丛;2006年02期
2 江必新;;司法与政治关系之反思与重构[J];湖南社会科学;2010年02期
3 罗东川;丁广宇;;论能动司法应处理好的几个关系[J];法律适用;2010年10期
4 夏锦文;;当下能动司法亟待处理的六大关系及解决思路[J];法律适用;2010年10期
5 罗东川;丁广宇;;我国能动司法的理论与实践评述[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
6 左卫民;;探寻纠纷解决的新模式——以四川“大调解”模式为关注点[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
7 艾佳慧;;“大调解”的运作模式与适用边界[J];法商研究;2011年01期
8 万春;;论构建有中国特色的司法独立制度[J];法学家;2002年03期
9 严励;;建构社会主义司法理念初论[J];法学;2006年07期
10 周永坤;;民意审判与审判元规则[J];法学;2009年08期
本文编号：2189942
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2189942.html
