“检察”一词的语义学探析
发布时间：2018-08-18 19:39
【摘要】："检察"与"监督"两个词语在表述上能够互换对等使用的状况,显现了在当今中国的理论界与实务界,对现代检察制度的权力属性和基本权能的一种认知与理解。依照不同语境的考证,在中文方面,"检察"与"监督"两词所指的语义确实相近。在外文方面,prōcūrōtor、prōsequor所产生的相关词语,其语义主要为"代理"和"控诉",在其沿革过程中,从未含有"监督"的内容。基于对中外"检察"相关词语表述方式的分析与比较,表明域外有关"检察"的相应用语中包含着历史性、制度性的内容、依据与背景,并且其有着从"公诉"职能的维度来把握和理解检察制度的习惯、传统与趋势。为此,应在开放性的前提下,对国内有关域外"检察"词语和现代检察制度的相应知识内容与认知方式,进行必要的反思。
[Abstract]:The condition that "procuratorial" and "supervision" can be used interchangeably and equally in expression shows a kind of cognition and understanding of the power attribute and basic power of modern procuratorial system in the theoretical and practical circles of China today. According to the textual research of different contexts, the semantics of "procuratorial" and "supervision" are similar in Chinese. In the aspect of foreign language, the related words produced by sequor are mainly "agent" and "complaint". In the process of its evolution, there has never been the content of "supervision". Based on the analysis and comparison of the expressions of Chinese and foreign "procuratorial" words, it is shown that the corresponding expressions of "procuratorial" in foreign countries contain historical, institutional content, basis and background. And it has the habit, tradition and trend to grasp and understand the procuratorial system from the function of public prosecution. Therefore, under the premise of openness, the necessary reflection should be made on the corresponding knowledge content and cognitive mode of foreign "procuratorial" words and modern procuratorial system in China.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.3
[Abstract]:The condition that "procuratorial" and "supervision" can be used interchangeably and equally in expression shows a kind of cognition and understanding of the power attribute and basic power of modern procuratorial system in the theoretical and practical circles of China today. According to the textual research of different contexts, the semantics of "procuratorial" and "supervision" are similar in Chinese. In the aspect of foreign language, the related words produced by sequor are mainly "agent" and "complaint". In the process of its evolution, there has never been the content of "supervision". Based on the analysis and comparison of the expressions of Chinese and foreign "procuratorial" words, it is shown that the corresponding expressions of "procuratorial" in foreign countries contain historical, institutional content, basis and background. And it has the habit, tradition and trend to grasp and understand the procuratorial system from the function of public prosecution. Therefore, under the premise of openness, the necessary reflection should be made on the corresponding knowledge content and cognitive mode of foreign "procuratorial" words and modern procuratorial system in China.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 陈瑞华;司法权的性质——以刑事司法为范例的分析[J];法学研究;2000年05期
2 陈卫东;我国检察权的反思与重构——以公诉权为核心的分析[J];法学研究;2002年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑晓华;达尔经济民主思想述评[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年02期
2 王文华,张平;关于检察权性质的思考[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
3 奚玮,何艳芳;“治愈”抑或“缓解”:死刑复核程序改革论析[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年03期
4 陆舫;论民事诉讼中当事人的再审诉权[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2003年04期
5 张云昊;;从前现代到现代——共同体变迁的内在逻辑及其启示[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
6 张从容;晚清官员的司法独立观[J];比较法研究;2003年04期
7 杨亚非;我国检察机关是合格的法律监督主体[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
8 方玮;共生理念——全球化进程中的价值建构[J];长白学刊;2001年06期
9 刘雪华;论我国公共权力的制约机制——一种政府公共性的视角[J];长白学刊;2004年06期
10 宋全成;解永照;;法律制度的界定[J];长春市委党校学报;2006年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 单波;肖s，
本文编号：2190477
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2190477.html
