审判管理程序化问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-24 17:41

【摘要】：正当法律程序是一个老生常谈的课题,它不仅仅是一个具有可操作性的法律使用原则,更重要的应该是一种理念,本文通过研究国内外的审判管理现状,以正当程序视域下的审判管理问题为研究切入点,深入剖析法院审判管理内容:从审判流程管理到案件质量监督评查管理,从案件司法绩效综合评估管理到司法数据统计四级网络管理,实现程序性保障的审判管理以符合司法公正和效率的要求。我国审判管理往往呈现脱离程序谈实体的片面思维,日积月累的使司法失去权威并产生一系列合法权益无法得到适时、充分、公正的保障和救济等问题,所以,对审判管理程序化问题进行研究有其现实需求。以正当程序的视角,给国内外研究的学者和审判管理改革者重申司法管理程序与实体并重理念,转变重实体轻程序的故旧传统思想模式、刷新重权力却忽视了如何依程序行使权力的审判管理改革局面,最高人民法院确定试行全国法院统一的审判管理实施细则为龙头,规范我国各级法院的审判管理体制,以正当的立法程序保障审判管理的管理程序,实现程序在管理中的具体价值,弥补诉讼法在法院审判管理的空白地带,最终起到保障公民合法权益的宪法责任。一项制度的拓展研究不仅仅在于直击制度本身,更重要的是思想意识的勇进,用思想的潮流来引领“实务改革”的前行,用思想的洪流来搏击改革进程之障碍,将审判管理程序本身所具有的正当性、程序性视为与案件经审判后公正的实体结果同等重要,并强调在审判管理过程中只有审判管理各项机制的设计体现正当法律程序的基本目标要求,才能在司法正义的基础上重申程序正义的理念。但是,在强调审判管理体制司法改革的程序化进程中,我们必须看到目前中国法院管理体制的“行政化”趋势,这是中国法院管理的现状,不能漠视,如何防止审判管理对“行政”的强化,避免审判管理“走过头”,无疑,我们需要强化程序理念,以正当程序的理念深入审判管理者思想根源,避免强化法院的行政化趋势的同时,推动审判管理者对程序价值的深入认识,走程序保障司法公正效率之路。
[Abstract]:Due process of law is a platitudinous topic. It is not only an operational principle of the use of law, but also an idea. This paper studies the current situation of trial management at home and abroad. From the perspective of due process, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the contents of court trial management: from trial process management to case quality supervision and evaluation management. From the case judicial performance comprehensive evaluation management to the judicial data statistics four level network management, realizes the procedural safeguard trial management to meet the judicial justice and the efficiency request. The trial management of our country often presents the one-sided thinking of the entity without the procedure, and gradually makes the judicature lose its authority and produces a series of legal rights and interests which can not get timely, sufficient, fair protection and relief and so on, so, It is necessary to study the procedure of trial management. From the perspective of due process, this paper restates the concept of equal emphasis on judicial management procedure and entity to scholars and trial management reformers both at home and abroad, and changes the old traditional mode of emphasizing substance over procedure. The Supreme people's Court has decided to try out the unified rules for the implementation of the trial management of the national courts and standardized the trial management system of the courts at all levels in our country. The proper legislative procedure can guarantee the management procedure of trial management, realize the concrete value of procedure in the management, make up the blank area of the procedure law in the court trial management, and finally play the constitutional responsibility of protecting the legal rights and interests of citizens. The development of a system is not only a direct attack on the system itself, but more importantly, the brave advance of ideology, the use of the tide of thought to lead the "practical reform" forward, and the use of the torrent of thought to fight the obstacles to the reform process. Considering the legitimacy of the trial management procedure itself as important as the substantive outcome of a case that is fair after trial, In the course of trial management, it is emphasized that only when the mechanism of trial management embodies the basic objective of due process of law, can the concept of procedural justice be reaffirmed on the basis of judicial justice. However, in emphasizing the procedural process of judicial reform of the trial management system, we must see the "administrative" trend of the current Chinese court management system, which is the current situation of Chinese court management and cannot be ignored. How to prevent the trial management from strengthening "administration" and avoiding "going too far" in trial management, undoubtedly, we need to strengthen the concept of procedure and go deep into the ideological roots of trial managers with the idea of due process. While avoiding the trend of strengthening the administration of the court, we should promote the judge administrator's deep understanding of the procedural value and take the road of ensuring the judicial justice and efficiency by the procedure.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】