司法公信力的比较研究
发布时间:2018-08-27 15:27
【摘要】:“司法公信力”词语中包含的汉字,“公”、“公信”结合具体的语境能够得出新的含义。司法之“公”包含了如下含义:司法权归根结底属于社会公众、整个司法系统是面向社会公众的公共服务制度,司法权在运行时要向公众保证公平、公正,并最后由公众对司法权进行评价。“司法公信”是指社会公众根据自身对司法权的运行状态对司法产生的认同和服从的心理感受,属于主体的主观评价、心理反应及价值判断。现代司法的人民性决定了司法必须取得公信。司法自信是司法机关、法官在司法运行过程中自我认同的程度及自我评价。司法他信是某一社会公众或者社会群体对司法的信任程度和评价。司法他信组成了司法公信;司法自信与司法他信相互促进增长。 英美法系关于培养和维护司法公信力的经验比较丰富,其司法权的独立行使制度、陪审团制度、判例法制度、法官的任选及任职保障制度值得借鉴。阿拉伯国家的宗教、地缘、战争、国家的政治体制等多种因素影响着司法公信力的提升,要引以为戒。 通过对司法公信力调研报告的分析,得出影响现阶段中国司法公信力的原因。结合理论分析得出中国提升司法公信力的路径和解决具体问题的建议。
[Abstract]:The Chinese characters, "public" and "public trust" contained in the words "judicial credibility" can be combined with specific context to obtain new meanings. The judicial "public" contains the following meanings: judicial power belongs to the public in the final analysis, the entire judicial system is a public service system for the public, and the judicial power should guarantee fairness and justice to the public when it operates. Finally, the judicial power is evaluated by the public. "Judicial Public Credit" refers to the social public's recognition of the judicial power and their psychological feelings of obedience according to their own operating state of judicial power. It belongs to the subjective evaluation, psychological reaction and value judgment of the subject. The popular nature of modern justice determines that justice must obtain public trust. Judicial confidence is the judicial organ, judges in the judicial process of self-identification and self-evaluation. Judicial Thaksin is a certain social public or social groups of judicial trust and evaluation. Judicial Thaksin constitutes judicial public trust, and judicial confidence and judicial Thaksin promote each other's growth. Anglo-American law system has rich experience in cultivating and maintaining judicial credibility, and its independent exercise system of judicial power, jury system, case law system, the system of optional selection of judges and the system of job security are worthy of reference. The religion, geography, war and political system of the Arab countries influence the judicial credibility. Through the analysis of the investigation report of judicial credibility, the reasons that influence the judicial credibility of China at present are obtained. Combined with theoretical analysis, this paper draws the path of improving judicial credibility in China and some suggestions to solve specific problems.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D926
本文编号:2207692
[Abstract]:The Chinese characters, "public" and "public trust" contained in the words "judicial credibility" can be combined with specific context to obtain new meanings. The judicial "public" contains the following meanings: judicial power belongs to the public in the final analysis, the entire judicial system is a public service system for the public, and the judicial power should guarantee fairness and justice to the public when it operates. Finally, the judicial power is evaluated by the public. "Judicial Public Credit" refers to the social public's recognition of the judicial power and their psychological feelings of obedience according to their own operating state of judicial power. It belongs to the subjective evaluation, psychological reaction and value judgment of the subject. The popular nature of modern justice determines that justice must obtain public trust. Judicial confidence is the judicial organ, judges in the judicial process of self-identification and self-evaluation. Judicial Thaksin is a certain social public or social groups of judicial trust and evaluation. Judicial Thaksin constitutes judicial public trust, and judicial confidence and judicial Thaksin promote each other's growth. Anglo-American law system has rich experience in cultivating and maintaining judicial credibility, and its independent exercise system of judicial power, jury system, case law system, the system of optional selection of judges and the system of job security are worthy of reference. The religion, geography, war and political system of the Arab countries influence the judicial credibility. Through the analysis of the investigation report of judicial credibility, the reasons that influence the judicial credibility of China at present are obtained. Combined with theoretical analysis, this paper draws the path of improving judicial credibility in China and some suggestions to solve specific problems.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 关玫;司法公信力的结构性要素[J];长春大学学报;2004年05期
2 四川省高级人民法院课题组;李少平;郝银钟;;人民法院司法公信力调查报告[J];法律适用;2007年04期
3 陈越洋;;中东剧变中的青年因素分析[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年02期
4 安惠侯;;西亚北非政治格局变化及其走向[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年02期
5 陈发桂;;公众司法参与视角下我国司法公信力的生成探析[J];前沿;2010年03期
6 北京市第一中级人民法院课题组;王明达;吴在存;刘井玉;伍涛;;关于加强人民法院司法公信力建设的调研报告[J];人民司法;2011年05期
7 曹志瑜;;我国司法公信力建设的现状分析与对策建议[J];中共天津市委党校学报;2012年06期
8 江必新;;深化审监制度改革 力促司法公信力提升[J];人民司法;2012年03期
9 姚远光;;两大法系法官地位差异成因刍议[J];湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
10 陈立军;陈立民;;司法公信力生成基础研究[J];湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李立新;中外法官管理制度比较研究[D];中南大学;2010年
2 杨喜平;社会资本视野下的司法公信力[D];复旦大学;2008年
,本文编号:2207692
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2207692.html