论我国法官解释机制的建构
[Abstract]:The current legal interpretation in China includes legislative interpretation, judicial interpretation and administrative interpretation. For a long time, the law of our country has not given judges the power of legal interpretation. But the judge explanation is the objective existence in the judicial practice, the actual existence and the law does not recognize the contradiction, causes our country judge to explain without its name but actually acts the strange phenomenon. The first chapter of this paper starts with the concept, characteristics, object and meaning of the judge's interpretation, and tries to make the reader have a basic understanding of the judge's interpretation. The second chapter analyzes the embarrassing situation of the judges' explanation in our country, and points out the problems existing in the interpretation of our country's judges. The current legal interpretation mechanism of our country is not perfect and denies the existence of the judge's power of interpretation. However, in practice, the judge's legal interpretation is inevitable, which is the current situation of our country's judges' interpretation and the problems faced by the construction of the judge's interpretation mechanism. The third chapter outlines the content of constructing the interpretation mechanism of judges in our country. Firstly, this chapter proposes to establish the legal status of the interpretation of judges in legislation, which is also the basis and basis of the construction of the system, and then from the principles of the interpretation of judges. The method and basis of the judge's explanation, the limit of the judge's explanation and so on are expounded. Finally, it is concluded that it is urgent to construct the mechanism of judge interpretation in our country, which is not only the need of the development of legal interpretation, but also the requirement of standardizing the power of interpretation of judges and preventing the abuse of power.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐晓峰;法治、法律解释与司法改革[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年04期
2 葛洪义;;法律方法的性质与作用——兼论法律的结构及其客观性[J];法律方法与法律思维;2005年00期
3 陈金钊;法律解释学的转向与实用法学的第三条道路(下)[J];法学评论;2002年02期
4 姚莉,杨帆;法官的自治、自律与司法公正[J];法学评论;1999年04期
5 周芳;;法律解释在法律适用中的规则[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年01期
6 谢晓琴;;法律解释:法律适用的本质[J];法制与社会;2009年19期
7 李水明;余向阳;卓茂华;;法官应完美地融入法律——刑事司法中法律解释之科学性论纲[J];消费导刊;2009年19期
8 陈金钊;法律的特性与法律解释——法律解释的一种本体论探索[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
9 祝爱珍;王铭;;论霍姆斯的现实主义法学思想——从“法律的生命不是逻辑,而是经验”谈起[J];宁德师专学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
10 陈艳美;论法官解释——兼谈我国司法解释体制的改革[J];山东电大学报;2004年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 铜山县检察院 王艳雯;[N];江苏法制报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李伟;法官解释确定性的研究[D];山东大学;2007年
2 姜福东;返回方法论的法律解释学[D];山东大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 梁彩虹;法官的法律解释研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 孟欣然;法官法律解释主体资格研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
,本文编号:2251568
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2251568.html