从强制型到权威型:中国司法的范式转变——以法理学教材为主线
发布时间：2018-10-31 06:59
【摘要】：1949年以来,中国司法经历了某种范式性转变。法理学教材中的法律适用理论为这种转变奠定了最一般的理论基础,从而可以将中国司法理论的转变概括为从强制型司法到权威型司法的转变。强制型司法的母体是20世纪40年代和20世纪50年代苏联的法律适用理论,中国法理学在继承这一理论母体的基础上,形成了强制型司法,它具有强制性、工具性和阶级性。从20世纪80年代下半期到20世纪90年代中期,强制型司法逐渐演变为权威型司法。权威型司法具有权威性、目的性和专业性。当前,权威型司法仍面临着一些需要解答的问题,因而也存在进一步完善的空间。
[Abstract]:Since 1949, China's judiciary has undergone a paradigm shift. The theory of application of law in jurisprudence textbooks lays the most general theoretical basis for this change, thus the transformation of Chinese judicial theory can be summarized as the transformation from compulsory to authoritative justice. The mother of compulsory justice is the applicable theory of law in the Soviet Union in the 1940s and 1950s. On the basis of inheriting this theory, Chinese jurisprudence has formed the compulsory judicature, which has the characteristics of compulsion, instrumentality and class. From the second half of 1980's to the middle of 1990's, compulsory judicature gradually evolved into authoritative judicature. The authoritative judicature is authoritative, purposeful and professional. At present, authoritative judicature still faces some questions that need to be solved, so there is room for further improvement.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院国际法研究所;
【分类号】：D926
，
本文编号：2301328
[Abstract]:Since 1949, China's judiciary has undergone a paradigm shift. The theory of application of law in jurisprudence textbooks lays the most general theoretical basis for this change, thus the transformation of Chinese judicial theory can be summarized as the transformation from compulsory to authoritative justice. The mother of compulsory justice is the applicable theory of law in the Soviet Union in the 1940s and 1950s. On the basis of inheriting this theory, Chinese jurisprudence has formed the compulsory judicature, which has the characteristics of compulsion, instrumentality and class. From the second half of 1980's to the middle of 1990's, compulsory judicature gradually evolved into authoritative judicature. The authoritative judicature is authoritative, purposeful and professional. At present, authoritative judicature still faces some questions that need to be solved, so there is room for further improvement.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院国际法研究所;
【分类号】：D926
，
本文编号：2301328
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2301328.html
