当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

宽严相济刑事政策在监狱行刑中的适用研究

发布时间:2018-11-07 16:25
【摘要】:宽严相济是党和国家针对当前犯罪整体态势而确立并必定长期坚持的刑事政策,宗旨是严厉打击严重刑事犯罪,从宽处罚一般犯罪,以宽济严,从而实现预防和减少犯罪的目的,促进社会的和谐稳定,其贯穿于刑事立法、司法和刑罚执行等各环节。刑罚执行是将裁判文书确立的刑罚付诸实施,惩罚和教育改造罪犯,从而使减少和预防刑事犯罪的政策目的得以实现。宽严相济刑事政策完善了惩罚和预防犯罪对策体系,确立科学、合理、人道的行刑理念和方式,而刑罚的执行是实现刑事政策目的的重要途径,其执行效果是对刑事政策的科学性、正确性、有效性的检验与衡量。宽严相济刑事政策无疑对监狱刑罚的执行发挥了重要的指导作用,同时,因为监狱布局不合理、监狱管理理念及方式落后、立法滞后和执法怪圈导致刑罚矫正功能未充分发挥等因素制约着宽严相济刑事政策的在监狱行刑中的深入贯彻。解决上述问题,关键是引入先进行刑理念,如教育刑、刑罚谦抑、行刑科学化、行刑社会化理念;完善监狱布局及内部结构设置,改革监狱管理方式,细化分类关押,推行管理分级和处遇分等直至实行开放式处遇;改造刑罚矫正制度,下放减刑、假释的管辖权,完善减刑程序,扩大假释的适用,提高减刑、假释的效率等等,从而实现区别对待,宽严有别。对主观恶性较深的严重刑事罪犯在监禁上从严管束,在减刊、假释上从严掌握,对主观恶性较小、情节较轻的未成年犯、初犯、偶犯及丧失作案能力的病残犯、老年犯在处遇上从松,尽量适用假释、减刑。冈此,通过完善监狱行刑制度以丰富宽严相济刑事政策,使刑事政策与监狱刑罚的执行相辅相成,共同实现减少和预防犯罪的目的。
[Abstract]:Combining leniency with severity is a criminal policy established by the Party and the state in view of the overall situation of the current crime and must be adhered to for a long time. Its purpose is to severely crack down on serious criminal crimes, to punish ordinary crimes with leniency, and to punish them with leniency and strictness. In order to achieve the purpose of crime prevention and reduction, promote social harmony and stability, it runs through the criminal legislation, justice and penalty enforcement and other links. The execution of penalty is to carry out the penalty established in the judgment document, to punish and educate and reform the criminal, so as to realize the policy goal of reducing and preventing the criminal crime. The criminal policy of combining leniency and severity with punishment has perfected the system of punishment and crime prevention, established scientific, reasonable and humane concept and method of execution, and the execution of penalty is an important way to achieve the purpose of criminal policy. Its execution effect is the scientific, correct and effective test and measurement of criminal policy. The criminal policy of combining leniency with severity undoubtedly plays an important guiding role in the execution of prison penalty. At the same time, because of the unreasonable layout of the prison, the concept and method of prison management are backward. The lag of legislation and the strange circle of law enforcement lead to the failure to give full play to the function of penalty correction, which restricts the deep implementation of the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity in the execution of prison sentences. To solve the above problems, the key is to introduce advanced concepts of execution, such as educational punishment, penalty restraint, execution of scientific, execution of the concept of socialization; Improve the layout and internal structure of the prison, reform the way of prison management, refine the classification of detention, carry out the management classification and meet the situation, etc., until the implementation of open treatment; Reform the system of penalty correction, devolve the jurisdiction of commutation and parole, perfect commutation procedure, expand the application of parole, improve the efficiency of commutation and parole, etc. Severe criminal criminals with deeper subjective malignancy are under strict control of imprisonment, strict control in publication reduction and parole, and minor juvenile offenders, first-time offenders, occasional offenders, and disabled criminals who have less subjective malignancy and less serious circumstances. Old criminals in the place from loose, try to apply parole, commutation of sentence. Therefore, by perfecting the system of prison execution and enriching the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, the criminal policy and the execution of prison punishment complement each other, so as to achieve the purpose of reducing and preventing crime together.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.7

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 邹湘高;;评“宽严相济”刑事政策视野下的刑罚执行[J];东方论坛;2008年05期

2 高铭暄;;宽严相济刑事政策与酌定量刑情节的适用[J];法学杂志;2007年01期

3 储槐植;赵合理;;构建和谐社会与宽严相济刑事政策之实现[J];法学杂志;2007年01期

4 彭辅顺;;宽严相济的刑事政策在减刑中的运用[J];前沿;2008年07期

5 罗干;;政法机关在构建和谐社会中担负重大历史使命和政治责任[J];求是;2007年03期

6 马克昌;;宽严相济刑事政策刍议[J];人民检察;2006年19期

7 安聪聪;从“严打”看刑罚的威慑效应[J];上海大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期

8 傅达林;;刑事和解:从“有害的正义”到“无害的正义”[J];社会观察;2005年12期

9 章梅娟;;我国监狱减刑制度完善研究——从新疆兵团监狱减刑执行情况谈起[J];行政与法;2009年02期

10 马静华;刑事和解制度论纲[J];政治与法律;2003年04期



本文编号:2316904

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2316904.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d2a3a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com