减刑假释审理:从“纳什均衡”走向“利益最大”

发布时间：2019-02-11 07:22

【摘要】：正2012年7月1日即将施行的《关于办理减刑、假释案件具体应用法律若干问题的规定》第26条规定:人民法院审理减刑、假释案件,可以采用书面审理的方式。但下列案件,应当开庭审理:(一)因服刑人员有重大立功表现提请减刑的;(二)提请减刑的起始时间、间隔时间或者减刑幅度不符合一般规定的;(三)在社会上有重大影响或社会关注度高的;(四)公示期间收到投诉意见的;(五)人民检察院有异议的;(六)人民法院认为有开庭审理必要的。从而较之2010年2月8日印发的《关于贯彻宽严相济
[Abstract]:On July 1, 2012, Article 26 of the provisions on the specific Application of Law to commutation and Parole cases stipulates that the people's Court may hear commutation and parole cases in writing. However, the following cases shall be heard in court: (1) where the sentence is commuted because of his or her great meritorious service; (2) if the initial time, interval or extent of commutation of the sentence is not in conformity with the general provisions; (3) having great influence on the society or having a high degree of social concern; (4) receiving complaints during the publicity period; (5) the people's procuratorates having objections; and (6) where the people's court deems it necessary to hold a court session to hear the case. This compares with the report issued on February 8, 2010, on the implementation of the "combination of leniency and severity"
【作者单位】：浙江大学法学院;浙江省宁波市中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.2

【相似文献】