我国检察委员会制度若干问题研究
发布时间:2019-02-13 04:42
【摘要】:我国的检察委员会制度,是在借鉴苏联检察制度的基础上同我国的国情相结合的产物,是民主制在检察体制建设中的折射。随着我国司法改革进程的推进,检察改革也正处于进行时,检察委员会作为我国检察制度较为典型的一部分,不可避免地参与到了改革浪潮之中。从1999年检察委员会制度开始改革以来,检察委员会的改革工作取得了一定的成效。不过,总体来看,虽然这些改革在一定程度上强化了检察委员会的职能,但均是局部性改良,检察委员会的职能并未得到实质性的优化。同时,改革也还面临着一定的理论困境和目的困境。为了能对检察委员会制度的改革有所裨益,本文主要分四个部分,从四个方面分别对我国检察委员会制度进行了研究:第一部分,主要以我国建国后的规范性法律文件为基础,从四个方面对我国检察委员会制度的演变过程进行梳理和比较;第二部分,主要从改革的角度讨论了关于我国检察委员会制度的存与废的问题,并提出和论证了我国检察委员会制度应当保留的观点;第三部分,分别从发展的视角阐述了我国检察委员会制度的改革方向,从权力运行的角度分析了检察委员会与检察院内外部各方的关系;从对“重大”进行合理解释的角度,对检察委员会的职权范围进行了重新分析;从检察委员会职能的“二元性”,提出了对我国检察委员会决策程序进行“二元化”模式构建的设想;最后一部分,,通过对检察委员会与审判委员会进行简单的对比,分析了检察委员会与审判委员会在本质上的区别。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial committee system of our country is the product of combining the procuratorial system of the Soviet Union with the national conditions of our country and the refraction of democracy in the construction of procuratorial system. With the advancement of judicial reform in our country, the procuratorial committee, as a typical part of the procuratorial system in our country, inevitably participates in the tide of reform. Since the reform of the procuratorial committee system began in 1999, the reform of the procuratorial committee has achieved certain results. However, in general, although these reforms have strengthened the functions of the procuratorial committee to some extent, they are all local improvements, and the functions of the procuratorial committee have not been substantially optimized. At the same time, the reform is also faced with a certain theoretical and objective dilemma. In order to benefit the reform of the procuratorial committee system, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part is mainly based on the normative legal documents after the founding of the people's Republic of China. The evolution process of the procuratorial committee system in China is combed and compared from four aspects. The second part mainly discusses the problem of the existence and abolishment of the procuratorial committee system from the angle of reform, and puts forward and demonstrates the viewpoint that the procuratorial committee system of our country should keep; The third part expounds the reform direction of the procuratorial committee system from the perspective of development and analyzes the relationship between the procuratorial committee and the internal and external parties of the procuratorate from the angle of power operation. From the angle of reasonable explanation of "important", this paper reanalyzes the terms of reference of the procuratorial committee; From the duality of the function of the procuratorial committee, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the dualistic mode of the decision-making procedure of the procuratorial committee in our country. In the last part, the author analyzes the essential difference between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee through a simple comparison between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee.
【学位授予单位】:中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.3
本文编号:2421189
[Abstract]:The procuratorial committee system of our country is the product of combining the procuratorial system of the Soviet Union with the national conditions of our country and the refraction of democracy in the construction of procuratorial system. With the advancement of judicial reform in our country, the procuratorial committee, as a typical part of the procuratorial system in our country, inevitably participates in the tide of reform. Since the reform of the procuratorial committee system began in 1999, the reform of the procuratorial committee has achieved certain results. However, in general, although these reforms have strengthened the functions of the procuratorial committee to some extent, they are all local improvements, and the functions of the procuratorial committee have not been substantially optimized. At the same time, the reform is also faced with a certain theoretical and objective dilemma. In order to benefit the reform of the procuratorial committee system, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part is mainly based on the normative legal documents after the founding of the people's Republic of China. The evolution process of the procuratorial committee system in China is combed and compared from four aspects. The second part mainly discusses the problem of the existence and abolishment of the procuratorial committee system from the angle of reform, and puts forward and demonstrates the viewpoint that the procuratorial committee system of our country should keep; The third part expounds the reform direction of the procuratorial committee system from the perspective of development and analyzes the relationship between the procuratorial committee and the internal and external parties of the procuratorate from the angle of power operation. From the angle of reasonable explanation of "important", this paper reanalyzes the terms of reference of the procuratorial committee; From the duality of the function of the procuratorial committee, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the dualistic mode of the decision-making procedure of the procuratorial committee in our country. In the last part, the author analyzes the essential difference between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee through a simple comparison between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee.
【学位授予单位】:中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺卫方;;关于审判委员会的几点评论[J];北大法律评论;1998年02期
2 陈瑞华;;正义的误区——评法院审判委员会制度[J];北大法律评论;1998年02期
3 葛洪义;试论法律论证的源流与旨趣[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年05期
4 陈光中,陈海光;中国刑事诉讼制度的进一步完善[J];法律适用;2000年01期
5 张毅;王中开;;论检察委员会的去行政化[J];法学杂志;2008年04期
6 龙宗智;论检察权的性质与检察机关的改革[J];法学;1999年10期
7 邓思清;;论我国检察委员会制度改革[J];法学;2010年01期
8 王姗;;检察委员会制度初探[J];法制与社会;2010年31期
9 王志刚;;论我国检察委员会制度之改革[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2009年03期
10 宋凯利;;试论检察委员会的内外部关系[J];中国检察官;2011年05期
本文编号:2421189
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2421189.html