当信仰危机遭遇和谐司法——由彭宇案现象透视司法与传媒关系

发布时间：2019-02-13 14:05

【摘要】：近几年来,传媒在一系列的个案中所表现的影响力强烈地冲击着既定的权力架构关系,一霎时,"媒体审判"的舆论甚嚣尘上。一方面,媒体对司法过程和裁判的准确报道甚至包括批评都会对司法的社会公信进而对法治本身有不可估量的贡献,另一方面,利用媒体优势对正在审理中的案件主导舆论导向,甚至是进行一些夸张、失实的报道,又严重地侵害着法院依法独立行使审判权的法治精神。如何在两者之间达成一种平衡,既能保证媒体在形塑司法公正杜绝司法腐败中起到舆论监督作用,又能防止媒体不当监督造成的危害司法权问题,这不仅是中国司法界,而且是世界各国司法都面临的一个问题,它无疑需要我们理论上更深一步的论证权衡。本期策划中的几篇文章从实践出发并从不同的研究角度作出了探索。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the influence of the media in a series of cases strongly impinged on the established power structure. On the one hand, accurate media coverage of the judicial process and adjudication, including even criticism, will make an inestimable contribution to the social credibility of justice and thus to the rule of law itself, on the other hand, Taking advantage of the advantages of the media to guide the public opinion to the cases under trial, and even to carry out some exaggerated and false reports, seriously infringes the spirit of the rule of law by which the court exercises its judicial power independently according to law. How to strike a balance between the two can not only guarantee the media to play a supervisory role in shaping judicial justice and put an end to judicial corruption, but also prevent the improper supervision of the media from endangering judicial power. This is not only a matter of Chinese judicial circles. And it is a problem that every country in the world is faced with. Several articles in this issue are explored from practice and from different research angles.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目《中国案例指导制度研究》的阶段性成果,项目号为10zd&044
【分类号】：D926;G206

【相似文献】