新闻舆论监督和法院独立审判的冲突与平衡

发布时间：2019-02-17 19:20

【摘要】：在现代社会,自由的新闻舆论监督与独立的司法,是现代文明社会不可或缺的组成部分,是民主社会的重要标志,也是通行的国际准则。新闻舆论对法院审判的监督意味着公众通过媒体这一意识形态方式对司法领域里的组织及其成员的行为及行为方式实施的评价和约束,使之符合社会正义的行为要求。它是社会强有力的制衡力量,是最具有广泛性、道义性的监督形式。而法院独立行使审判权,是指审判权为法院所专有,因而是一种排他性权力,即除法院之外不允许其他机关行使这种职权。所有类型的社会冲突,最终皆以刑事、民事、行政诉讼的形式提交法院裁决,法院通过开庭审理,以裁决方式解决纠纷,化解冲突,维护国家法律的实施,审判权成为解决冲突的最后手段,其最终目的在于追求司法公正。新闻舆论对司法监督的目的,与司法界追求的目标是一致的,都是为了维护并确保司法公正,两者的目标一致,决定双方都应为司法公正而采取积极的合作态度,因此,从理论上说,媒体与审判机关应该保持良好的关系。但是在现实社会中却存在着错综复杂的关系。一方面两者存在相辅相成、相互促进的关系,另一方面两者之间也存在这冲突、抵制。当今学界对处理新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判之间的关系也存在不同的认识,本文就这个问题阐述一下作者的看法。首先,分析新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判的基本理论。新闻舆论监督的内涵、法律依据及其功能;法院独立审判的内涵、一般要求及其现实意义。其次,分析新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判之间的冲突。新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判理论上的应然关系;新闻舆论监督与司法院独立审判现实存在的冲突;着重分析新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判存在冲突的原因剖析。最后,提出平衡新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判冲突的具体建议。域外平衡二者关系的经验;我国解决二者冲突的平衡点;着重提出我国平衡新闻舆论监督与法院独立审判间的冲突应采取的具体措施,主要从新闻舆论监督和法院两个方面各采取的措施。
[Abstract]:In modern society, free media supervision and independent judicature are an indispensable part of modern civil society, an important symbol of democratic society, and also an international norm. The supervision of the court trial by public opinion means that the public evaluates and restrains the behavior and behavior of the organization and its members in the judicial field through the ideological way of the media, making it conform to the behavior requirements of social justice. It is a powerful social check-and-balance force, is the most extensive, moral form of supervision. The independent exercise of judicial power by the court means that the judicial power is exclusive to the court, that is, it does not allow other organs to exercise this kind of authority except the court. All types of social conflicts are ultimately submitted to the courts for adjudication in the form of criminal, civil and administrative proceedings. The courts resolve disputes by adjudication, resolve conflicts and safeguard the implementation of national laws. Judicial power is the last means to resolve conflicts, and its ultimate aim is to pursue judicial justice. The aim of the public opinion on judicial supervision is the same as that pursued by the judicial circles, both of which are aimed at safeguarding and ensuring judicial justice, and their objectives are the same, and it is decided that both sides should adopt an active and cooperative attitude towards judicial justice. In theory, the media and the judiciary should maintain a good relationship. But in the real society, there are intricate relations. On the one hand, there is a mutually reinforcing and mutually reinforcing relationship between the two, on the other hand, there is a conflict between them. There are also different views on the relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. This paper expounds the author's views on this issue. First of all, analyze the basic theory of media supervision and independent trial. The connotation, legal basis and function of media supervision, the connotation, general requirements and practical significance of independent court trial. Secondly, the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court is analyzed. The theoretical relationship between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court; the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the reality of the independent trial of the judicial court; and the analysis of the reasons for the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. Finally, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions on balancing the conflict between media supervision and independent court trial. The experience of balancing the relationship between the two, the balance point of resolving the conflict between the two in our country; This paper puts forward the concrete measures to be taken to balance the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court, mainly from the two aspects of the supervision of news public opinion and the court.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2;G219.2

【参考文献】