当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

“三调联动”机制研究

发布时间:2019-03-01 13:06
【摘要】: 调解制度作为一项颇具中国特色的法律制度,以其独特方式化解矛盾,调和冲突,平衡社会关系,在现代法治社会中发挥着重要的作用。伴随着依法治国的实践进程,调解又衍生出多样的形式,三调联动机制正是其中之一。作为一种新型的调解制度,对其的研究还比较少,本文主要通过结合本人所在湖南省湘潭市的三调联动案例和相关法学理论对这一制度进行分析和思考。 第一章,三调联动机制的概述和价值分析。本章首先对三调联动的概念进行分析说明,再以湘潭市三调联动为蓝本结合案例对三调联动的组织机构和运作方式做分析说明并总结其特征。最后对三调联动机制的价值进行分析。 第二章,三调联动产生的背景和原因分析。本章主要从四个方面来分析其背景和产生的原因,首先分析了三调联动是在中国当代社会转型时期的社会矛盾复杂性的大背景下产生的,其次分析了该机制的产生离不开中国的传统调解文化背景,再次,作为民间调解的核心人民调解遭遇了各种困境,最后分析法院面临日益增长的诉讼压力和诉讼本身的局限性促使了三调联动的产生。 第三章,对三调联动的反思。本章从法治,司法公正,调解自愿,社会自治几个角度分析了三调联动所存在的问题并提出相关建议。 第四章,建设有中国特色的非诉讼纠纷解决机制(ADR)。本章从三个方面展开,首先对美、英、日、德几个西方发达国家的非诉讼纠纷解决机制进行了介绍和比较分析,从而借鉴其经验。其次,提出中国特色的非诉讼纠纷解决机制应该是以诉讼为主导地位,各种非诉讼纠纷解决机制与司法诉讼有机结合的一种机制。最后提出对三调联动的未来发展建议,作为一种新型的且具有中国特色的非诉讼纠纷解决机制它的应该建设成一种维护司法权威,帮助中国实现自主型法治的高效的非诉讼纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:As a legal system with Chinese characteristics, mediation system plays an important role in modern rule of law society by resolving conflicts, reconciling conflicts and balancing social relations in its unique way. Along with the practice of ruling the country according to law, mediation derives a variety of forms, and the three-tone linkage mechanism is one of them. As a new mediation system, the research on it is still relatively little. This paper mainly analyzes and ponders this system by combining the case of three-tone linkage in Xiangtan City, Hunan Province, and the relevant law theory. The first chapter is the overview and value analysis of the three-tone linkage mechanism. In this chapter, the concept of three-tone linkage is first analyzed and explained, and then the organization and operation mode of three-tone linkage are analyzed and illustrated with a case study of Xiangtan city, and the characteristics of the three-tone linkage are summarized. Finally, the value of the three-tone linkage mechanism is analyzed. The second chapter, the background and the reason analysis of the triad linkage. This chapter mainly analyzes its background and reasons from four aspects. First of all, it analyzes that the three-tone linkage is produced under the background of the complexity of social contradictions in the period of social transformation in contemporary China. Secondly, it analyzes that the formation of this mechanism is inseparable from the cultural background of traditional mediation in China. Again, as the core of folk mediation, people's mediation has encountered various difficulties. Finally, it is analyzed that the court is faced with increasing litigation pressure and the limitation of litigation itself to promote the emergence of the three-tone linkage. The third chapter, the reflection on the three-tone linkage. This chapter analyzes the problems existing in the three-tone linkage from the angles of rule of law, judicial justice, voluntary mediation and social autonomy, and puts forward some suggestions. Chapter IV, Construction of non-litigation dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADR). With Chinese characteristics This chapter starts from three aspects. Firstly, it introduces and compares the non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism of several western developed countries, such as the United States, Britain, Japan and Germany, so as to draw lessons from their experiences. Secondly, it is pointed out that the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism with Chinese characteristics should be a kind of mechanism which takes litigation as the leading position and combines various non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms with judicial litigation. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions for the future development of the three-tone linkage. As a new type of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism with Chinese characteristics, it should be built into a kind of safeguarding judicial authority. To help China to achieve autonomous rule of law, an efficient non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 邱星美;;当代调解制度比较研究[J];比较法研究;2009年04期

2 张晓晓;;我国现行民事调解制度与ADR[J];边疆经济与文化;2008年09期

3 范愉;社会转型中的人民调解制度——以上海市长宁区人民调解组织改革的经验为视点[J];中国司法;2004年10期

4 石先广;;人民调解、行政调解、司法调解有机衔接的对策思考——以上海市杨浦区整合调解资源的实践探索为视点[J];中国司法;2006年08期

5 李冰;;湖南省“三调联动”工作机制的考察与思考[J];中国司法;2008年08期

6 章武生;;论我国大调解机制的构建——兼析大调解与ADR的关系[J];法商研究;2007年06期

7 张卫平;人民调解:完善与发展的路径[J];法学;2002年12期

8 毋爱斌;;对我国人民调解各地模式的考察[J];法治论坛;2009年02期

9 顾培东;;中国法治的自主型进路[J];法学研究;2010年01期

10 李浩;调解的比较优势与法院调解制度的改革[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2002年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 倪萍;大调解机制研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年

2 李年终;我国“诉调对接”的理论与实践研究[D];湘潭大学;2007年

3 翟伟伟;从法律文化的角度看我国的民间调解制度[D];中国政法大学;2008年

4 王洪娟;大调解研究[D];苏州大学;2009年



本文编号:2432449

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2432449.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f25c2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com