论合议庭少数意见的公开
发布时间：2019-05-28 11:56
【摘要】：少数意见的产生是合议庭论辩特质的逻辑结果。在我国,合议庭少数意见公开具有作为法官自我表演的媒介、培养法官职业尊荣感、提升司法裁判的准确性、促进司法公正和司法权威的提升等诸多制度利益,而当前的司法改革也为少数意见公开提供了必要的环境支持。因此,在推动裁判文书实质公开的过程中,应推行合议庭少数意见的公开,但为保障法官自由独立地发表评议意见,不宜通过公开合议庭评议笔录的方式公开少数意见。
[Abstract]:The emergence of minority opinions is the logical result of the characteristics of collegial panel arguments. In our country, the minority opinions of the collegial panel have many institutional interests, such as the media of judges' self-performance, the cultivation of judges' professional honor, the improvement of the accuracy of judicial judgment, the promotion of judicial justice and judicial authority, and so on. The current judicial reform also provides the necessary environmental support for the public opinion of the minority. Therefore, in the process of promoting the substantive publicity of judicial documents, the publicity of minority opinions of collegial panel should be carried out, but in order to ensure that judges express their opinions freely and independently, it is not appropriate to disclose minority opinions by means of public transcripts of collegial panel deliberations.
【作者单位】： 南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目“合议庭运行机制研究”(JAS160043)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2
，
本文编号：2487033
[Abstract]:The emergence of minority opinions is the logical result of the characteristics of collegial panel arguments. In our country, the minority opinions of the collegial panel have many institutional interests, such as the media of judges' self-performance, the cultivation of judges' professional honor, the improvement of the accuracy of judicial judgment, the promotion of judicial justice and judicial authority, and so on. The current judicial reform also provides the necessary environmental support for the public opinion of the minority. Therefore, in the process of promoting the substantive publicity of judicial documents, the publicity of minority opinions of collegial panel should be carried out, but in order to ensure that judges express their opinions freely and independently, it is not appropriate to disclose minority opinions by means of public transcripts of collegial panel deliberations.
【作者单位】： 南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目“合议庭运行机制研究”(JAS160043)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2
，
本文编号：2487033
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2487033.html
