异议股东股份回购请求权问题研究
发布时间：2018-07-23 18:39
【摘要】：现代公司决策普遍采取“资本多数决”原则,这一原则虽体现了股东民主、资本平等的理念,但在发生对股东的利害关系产生重大影响的公司变更时,如何既保护少数异议股东的权利,又不影响公司的正常经营和稳定发展,成为一个急需解决的问题。在公司发生基础性重大变化时,赋予异议股东一项权利,使异议股东有权要求公司以公平价格收买去股份,从而退出公司,此谓“异议股东股份回购请求权”。该请求权起源于美国,经过一百多年的发展演进,现已被世界上大多数国家采用,其中尤以美国的相关制度最为成熟、完善。该制度旨在平衡多数股东和少数股东的利益,并最终实现公平和效率的平衡,是对“资本多数决”的补充和匡正,是一项对少数股东保护的有效措施。 我国于2005年新修订的《公司法》中引入了“异议股东股份回购请求权”,无疑是一大进步。然而,立法仅仅对股份回购请求权进行了原则性的规定,缺乏明确性和具体性,实践操作不强,尚待立法的进一步完善。本文以异议股东股份回购请求权的基本原理出发,通过比较我国《公司法》的规定与各国的立法例,对其适用范围、行使程序等诸多问题进行系统分析,并结合我国的国情和立法现状提出了完善我国异议股东股份回购请求权制度的建议,使其能够在我国当前的立法和实践背景下有效地运作。
[Abstract]:The principle of "capital majority decision" is generally adopted in modern company decision-making. Although this principle embodies the concept of shareholder democracy and capital equality, when the company changes which have a significant impact on shareholders' interests, How to protect the rights of minority dissenting shareholders without affecting the normal operation and stable development of the company has become an urgent problem. When the fundamental and important changes take place in the company, the dissenting shareholders are given a right to ask the company to buy the shares at a fair price, thus withdrawing from the company, which is called the "right of claim for share repurchase by the dissenting shareholders". The right of claim originated in the United States, after more than 100 years of development and evolution, has been adopted by most countries in the world, especially the relevant system of the United States is the most mature and perfect. This system aims at balancing the interests of majority shareholders and minority shareholders, and finally realizes the balance of equity and efficiency. It is a supplement and correction to "capital majority decision" and an effective measure to protect minority shareholders. In 2005, China introduced the "right of claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders" in the newly revised Company Law, which is undoubtedly a great progress. However, the legislation only provides for the right of share repurchase in principle, which lacks clarity and specificity, and is not strong in practice, so it needs to be further improved by legislation. Based on the basic principle of the claim right of dissenting shareholders' share repurchase, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the scope of application, exercise procedure and so on by comparing the provisions of China's Company Law with the legislative examples of various countries. According to the situation of our country and the current situation of legislation, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of claim for share repurchase by dissenting shareholders, so that it can operate effectively under the background of current legislation and practice in our country.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2140286
[Abstract]:The principle of "capital majority decision" is generally adopted in modern company decision-making. Although this principle embodies the concept of shareholder democracy and capital equality, when the company changes which have a significant impact on shareholders' interests, How to protect the rights of minority dissenting shareholders without affecting the normal operation and stable development of the company has become an urgent problem. When the fundamental and important changes take place in the company, the dissenting shareholders are given a right to ask the company to buy the shares at a fair price, thus withdrawing from the company, which is called the "right of claim for share repurchase by the dissenting shareholders". The right of claim originated in the United States, after more than 100 years of development and evolution, has been adopted by most countries in the world, especially the relevant system of the United States is the most mature and perfect. This system aims at balancing the interests of majority shareholders and minority shareholders, and finally realizes the balance of equity and efficiency. It is a supplement and correction to "capital majority decision" and an effective measure to protect minority shareholders. In 2005, China introduced the "right of claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders" in the newly revised Company Law, which is undoubtedly a great progress. However, the legislation only provides for the right of share repurchase in principle, which lacks clarity and specificity, and is not strong in practice, so it needs to be further improved by legislation. Based on the basic principle of the claim right of dissenting shareholders' share repurchase, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the scope of application, exercise procedure and so on by comparing the provisions of China's Company Law with the legislative examples of various countries. According to the situation of our country and the current situation of legislation, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of claim for share repurchase by dissenting shareholders, so that it can operate effectively under the background of current legislation and practice in our country.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 甘培忠;论股东派生诉讼在中国的有效适用[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年05期
2 吴志宇;;论股份回购请求权[J];北方论丛;2007年02期
3 闻德锋,梁三利;论公司股东股份收购请求权[J];商业研究;2005年13期
4 陈芳;;对我国累积投票制度的反思——兼评《公司法》第106条之规定[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年04期
5 程功,陆佳;上市公司中小股东利益的保护与《公司法》的完善[J];财经科学;2002年S1期
6 魏磊杰;;论美国公司法中的异议股东股份评估权制度[J];研究生法学;2006年03期
7 鲍为民;美国法上的公司僵局处理制度及其启示[J];法商研究;2005年03期
8 孙聚团;浅议有限责任公司股东的退股权[J];法学杂志;2004年06期
9 程合红;试论股权的客体——物、股份、公司[J];法学;2000年01期
10 高汉;;股份回购及中小股东权益保护分析[J];甘肃社会科学;2007年05期
，本文编号：2140286
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2140286.html
