公司社会责任的可裁判性研究

发布时间：2019-02-25 12:47

【摘要】：《公司法》第5条关于公司社会责任的规定,是道德条款法律化的一次有益尝试。至于公司社会责任承担的实际强制力如何,则与作为外部强制的司法救济的有效性不无关系。中国公司与社会关系的落后性和中国公司发展的幼稚性使得司法裁判成为公司社会责任运动中不可或缺的重要一环。司法裁判是公力救济的典型形式和公司外部强制的不二选择,对于督促公司履行社会责任具有显著意义。《公司法》总则第5条作为一个原则性条款,它的指称亟待深入探讨,其裁判功能仍需详加考察。考虑到法律的规范和运行要求,公司社会责任应当逐渐发展其裁判的功能。本文拟在梳理学界关于公司社会责任可裁判性的理论争议和剖析司法实务界若干典型判例的基础上,尝试对公司社会责任在司法过程中的拘束力——可裁判性问题进行初步探讨。笔者认为,公司社会责任作为道德条款具有规范意义,可以引导乃至规范公司行为。当然,本文对于公司社会责任可裁判性问题的研究,旨在澄清若干模糊认识并预见《公司法》第5条裁判之可能性,并不表明笔者对于公司社会责任外部保障机制的司法至上立场。
[Abstract]:The stipulation on corporate social responsibility in Article 5 of Company Law is a beneficial attempt to legalize moral clauses. As for the actual force of corporate social responsibility, it has something to do with the effectiveness of judicial relief as external compulsion. The backwardness of Chinese corporate and social relations and the childish development of Chinese companies make judicial decision an indispensable and important part in the movement of corporate social responsibility. Judicial decision is the typical form of public relief and the choice of external compulsion, which has significant significance in urging the company to fulfill its social responsibility. As a principle clause, Article 5 of the General provisions of Company Law urgently needs to be discussed deeply. Its judging function still needs to be examined in detail. In view of the legal norms and operational requirements, corporate social responsibility should gradually develop its function of adjudication. On the basis of combing the theoretical disputes on the justiciability of corporate social responsibility in academic circles and analyzing some typical cases in judicial practice, This paper attempts to explore the justiciability of corporate social responsibility in the judicial process. The author believes that corporate social responsibility as a moral clause has normative significance, can guide and even regulate corporate behavior. Of course, the research on the justiciability of corporate social responsibility in this paper aims to clarify some vague understandings and foresee the possibility of adjudication in Article 5 of the Company Law. It does not indicate the judicial supremacy of the external safeguard mechanism of corporate social responsibility.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】