我国海域权索问题的综合求解——论冲突法方略作为和平治理方案的可能性、限度与效度

发布时间：2017-12-26 19:38

  本文关键词：我国海域权索问题的综合求解——论冲突法方略作为和平治理方案的可能性、限度与效度　出处：《法商研究》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 海域权索 历史主义 自然主义 冲突法方略 和平治理方案

【摘要】：我国与周边国家的海域权索争端在当代凸显出国际化、政治化、意识形态化和无序化的特征。我国作为争端核心国在权索主张的法理根据上存在并用自然主义与历史主义的矛盾。以意思自治和最密切联系为核心的冲突法方略可以有效实现这种自然主义与历史主义的融合,有助于我国与周边国家海域权索争端的解决。作为规则,冲突法的有效性是有限的;作为方案,冲突法的有限性则是有效的。冲突法的自律本性及其二级思维对包括海域权索在内的一切争端有无限有效性。意思自治、最密切联系以及立足自律之上的二级共识,三者构成我国海域权索问题的综合解决方案。
[Abstract]:The maritime dispute between China and the surrounding countries shows the characteristics of internationalization, politicization, ideology and disordering. China, as the core country of the dispute, exists in the jurisprudential basis of the claim of the right and uses the contradiction between naturalism and historicism. The strategy of conflict of laws with the core of autonomy and the most close relationship can effectively achieve the integration of naturalism and historicism, and help to solve the dispute of maritime claims between China and neighboring countries. As a rule, the effectiveness of the conflict of laws is limited; as a scheme, the finiteness of the conflict of laws is effective. The self disciplined nature of the law of conflict and its two level thought are of unlimited validity to all disputes, including the rights and cables of the sea area. The two level consensus on autonomy, the most close connection and the self-discipline, and the three are the comprehensive solutions to the issue of maritime rights and cables in China.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目(12BFX129) 教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(11YJC820161)
【分类号】：D997
【正文快照】： 受事实、历史和利益等错综复杂因素的影响,与我国涉海相邻或相向的国家几乎都与我国存在海域权索的争端。并且,这些海域权索争端在一些国家的推动下开始出现合成化、区域化和国际化的发展迹象,争端的外方当事国为提高自身的谈判力量策略性地合纵连横,双边问题的多边化乃至国，

本文编号：1338589