对伊朗制裁引发的租船合同合法货物研究
发布时间:2018-01-11 20:44
本文关键词:对伊朗制裁引发的租船合同合法货物研究 出处:《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:伊朗核问题引发了联合国、欧盟和美国对其进行的经济制裁。联合国通过的对伊朗制裁决议构成各成员国的义务。欧盟和美国对伊朗制裁的立法,已全面禁止欧盟区域内和美国国内几乎所有与伊朗有关的贸易往来和货物运输。然而,为达到其政治和经济的目的,欧盟和美国不断修改制裁法,使其单边制裁在域外产生效力,适用于全球的航运经营者。这对我国公司开展伊朗业务产生了重大影响。 本文通过分析联合国、欧盟和美国对伊朗制裁的现状,总结出各制裁法的适用主体和对国际进出口货物种类的限制。通过分析租船合同合法货物所适用的国内、国际法依据、美国和欧盟对伊朗制裁法的域外效力,进而总结出目前国际上对伊朗制裁的各项措施,对租船合同合法货物产生的影响。 本文分三章进行论述,第一章介绍目前对伊朗制裁的立法情况和货物限制。第二章分析判断租船合同合法货物的国内法和国际法依据,其中以我国《刑法》中相关规定为例进行研究。第三章探讨美国和欧盟单边制裁法对判断货物是否合法时的效力,并对租船合同当事人提供了几点建议。
[Abstract]:The Iran nuclear issue led to the United Nations, the European Union and the United States for economic sanctions by the United Nations resolution on sanctions against Iran constitute the obligations of the member states. The European Union and the United States legislation of sanctions against Iran, has banned in European region and the United States and Iran almost all the domestic trade and transport of goods. However,, to achieve its political and economic purposes, the European Union and the United States continue to modify the law sanctions, unilateral sanctions in the extraterritorial effect, suitable for global shipping operators. It had a great influence on our company to carry out business in Iran.
In this paper, through the analysis of the United Nations, the European Union and the United States the status quo of sanctions against Iran, summed up the subject of the sanctions law and restrictions on international import and export cargo types. Through the analysis of the contract legal goods for domestic and international law basis, the effectiveness of the United States and the European Union on Iran sanctions extraterritorial law, and summed up the the current measures of international sanctions against Iran, on charter legal goods produced.
This paper is divided into three chapters, the first chapter introduces the current legislative situation of sanctions against Iran and cargo restrictions. In the second chapter, analysis and judgment of charter party legitimate goods of domestic law and international law basis, with China's criminal law the relevant provisions stipulated in the < > as the case study. The third chapter discusses the United States and the EU unilateral sanctions on the judgement of effectiveness the goods are legal, and some suggestions on the charter party.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D996.19
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 徐崇利;;美国及其他西方国家经济立法域外适用的理论与实践评判[J];厦门大学法律评论;2001年01期
2 杜涛;;美国单边域外经济制裁的国际法效力问题探讨[J];湖南社会科学;2010年02期
3 杜涛;;欧盟对待域外经济制裁的政策转变及其背景分析[J];德国研究;2012年03期
4 常明霞;;伊朗制裁问题的国际法解析[J];朝阳法律评论;2012年01期
5 谭智礼;;租船合同下承租人的责任[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年S1期
6 王钢;论定期租船合同中的格式条款[J];世界海运;2001年03期
7 张丽,蒋志勇;定期租船合同下出租人风险分析[J];世界海运;2004年03期
8 许俊强;运单与定期租船合同并存时合同法律关系的识别[J];人民司法;1999年05期
,本文编号:1411170
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1411170.html