从中美“双反措施案”看外部基准的适用

发布时间：2018-01-16 00:09

本文关键词：从中美“双反措施案”看外部基准的适用　出处：《法学》2012年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：外部基准是美国对华反补贴中的一种典型做法,主要表现为美国商务部在计算中国国有企业投入物、政府提供土地使用权和国有商业银行的贷款等补贴利益时,以存在市场扭曲为由,拒绝中国国内价格作为比较基准转而适用外部基准。与外部基准有关的WTO规则存在含糊性和灵活性,而"第四软木案"开启了允许适用外部基准的先例。"双反措施案"的专家组和上诉机构认可了美国对华反补贴适用外部基准的合法性,并阐释了政府主导地位在认定市场扭曲时的权重、贷款利率可否适用外部基准以及实际适用的替代基准应符合的条件等问题。上述意见对我国具有消极的影响,因此我们需要在多边和国内两个层面做出努力,将外部基准的适用对中国产品出口的负面影响降至最低限度。
[Abstract]:External reference is a typical practice in the U.S. anti subsidy, mainly for the U.S. Department of Commerce in the calculation of Chinese state-owned enterprises input materials, land use rights and state-owned commercial bank loans and other benefits of subsidies provided by the government, to the existence of market distortions in the grounds, refused to China price as the benchmark apply instead of external reference. WTO the rules associated with external reference the existence of vagueness and flexibility, and the "fourth cork case" open allows for external reference precedent. "Dual counter measures" case of the panel and the appellate body recognized the legitimacy of the U.S. anti subsidy for external reference, and explains the leading position of the government in determining the market distortions the weight problem loans can apply to external reference and applicable alternative benchmark should conform to the conditions. The opinion has negative influence to our country, so we need to Efforts should be made at two levels, both at the multilateral and domestic levels, to minimize the negative impact of external benchmarks on the export of Chinese products.

【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：对外经济贸易大学“211工程”三期重点学科建设项目的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D996.1
【正文快照】： 以美国为代表的Wm成员对华反补贴所涉法律问题是近年来国际经济法学界研究中的热点问题，新近结案的中国诉美国“双反措施案”更是将这一热点推向高潮。美国在对华反补贴调查中存在着一种典型做法，即美国商务部在计算中国国有企业投人物、政府提供土地使用权和国有商业银行

【相似文献】