论国际体育仲裁院仲裁权边界

发布时间：2018-01-24 12:42

本文关键词： 仲裁权国际体育仲裁院边界　出处：《湘潭大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着全球性体育运动的普及和发展，国际体育赛事增多，体育争议与纠纷也相伴而增。国际体育仲裁院（CAS）作为体育纠纷解决的权威性和专门性机构，发挥着日益重要的作用。本文以CAS仲裁权行使为中心，围绕CAS本身的性质，探讨其裁决权行使的“边界”问题，对指导CAS的仲裁实践具有一定的创新价值。文章开篇围绕CAS本质属性的界定问题，通过与传统商事仲裁的比较和对CAS已判案例的剖析，得出结论：CAS是特别（准司法）仲裁机构。它一方面表明CAS仲裁机构的本性——其权力行使有时需要借助当事人间的合意；另一方面又强调了其司法化趋势与传统商事仲裁的异同。仲裁机构的本性要求其仲裁权受到当事人意思自治等原则的制约，司法化趋势又要求CAS的裁决应尊重体育组织内部的自治。该机构性质的两面性决定了界定CAS仲裁权边界的难度。随后，文章从大量案例中寻求CAS仲裁实践的轨迹。通过对案例的比较、归纳、总结，可以得出，CAS在现阶段的仲裁实践存在一定问题。如外部问题——CAS与IOC和IFS关系混乱，内部问题——CAS自身裁决权过分扩张等。这些问题表现在CAS的仲裁实践中，尚未引起学界和体育界专家的广泛关注，但这些问题若不加以妥善解决，将阻碍CAS仲裁制度进一步发挥应有作用，从根本上影响体育纠纷的合理解决。接下来，文章提出对CAS进行机构改革的内在动力——行业自治理论和外在动力——仲裁权基本理论。它们共同说明CAS仲裁权应当受到合理限制。另外，，司法束缚主义、体育特殊性等均构成促进CAS实现职能完善的强大力量。最后，笔者提出了针对上述问题的改革措施——CAS职能分化和机构改革是解决实践中存在问题的必由之路。该措施包括总括性原则和具体规则两个部分。笔者的建议是粗浅的，但希望“CAS仲裁权边界”这一选题能得到学界相关专家的关注和重视，希望CAS在改革后能更公正、更科学、更恰当地处理体育纠纷。
[Abstract]:With the popularity and development of global sports, the number of international sports events, sports disputes and disputes are also increasing. The International Sports Arbitration Court (CAS) as an authoritative and specialized body for sports dispute resolution. This paper centers on the exercise of CAS arbitration right and discusses the "boundary" of CAS's adjudication power around the nature of CAS itself. It has certain innovation value to guide the arbitration practice of CAS. At the beginning of the article, the author focuses on the definition of the essential attribute of CAS, through the comparison with the traditional commercial arbitration and the analysis of the cases that have been decided by CAS. It is concluded that: cas is a special (quasi-judicial) arbitration institution. On the one hand, it shows the nature of the CAS arbitration institution-its power sometimes needs to be exercised by the agreement of the parties; On the other hand, it emphasizes the similarities and differences between the judicial trend and the traditional commercial arbitration. The nature of the arbitration institution requires its arbitration right to be restricted by the principle of party autonomy. The trend of judicature also requires that the ruling of CAS should respect the autonomy within the sports organization. The dual character of the organization determines the difficulty of defining the boundary of the arbitration right of CAS. Subsequently, the article from a large number of cases to seek the track of CAS arbitration practice. Through the comparison of cases, induction, summary, can be drawn. There are some problems in the arbitration practice of CAS at the present stage, such as external problems, such as the confusion of the relationship between IOC and IFS. The internal problems, such as the excessive expansion of the adjudication power of CAS itself, have not yet aroused the extensive attention of scholars and sports experts, but these problems have not been properly resolved. Will hinder the CAS arbitration system further play its due role, fundamentally affect the reasonable settlement of sports disputes. Next. In this paper, the author puts forward the theory of industry autonomy and the basic theory of extrinsic power- arbitration right, which show that the CAS arbitration right should be restricted reasonably. Judicial bondage doctrine, sports particularity and so on all constitute the powerful force to promote the CAS to realize the function consummation. Finally. The author puts forward the reform measures to solve the above problems-CAS function differentiation and institutional reform are the only way to solve the existing problems in practice. This measure includes two parts: the omnibus principle and the concrete rules. The discussion is superficial. However, it is hoped that the topic of "the boundary of CAS arbitration right" will be paid attention to by relevant experts in academic circles, and that CAS can deal with sports disputes more fairly, scientifically and appropriately after the reform.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】