国际商事仲裁协议的效力问题研究
本文关键词: 国际商事仲裁 仲裁协议 有效条件 效力 出处:《大连海事大学》2012年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:国际商事仲裁是随着世界经济发展而发展的,中国的仲裁制度起步较晚,并且具有明显的中国特色。中国加入WTO后,对全世界的经济贸易产生了重大影响,但随着世界经济的快速发展,也出现了大量争议和经济纠纷,这对我国商事仲裁起到了客观推动的作用。同时,也要求我国仲裁制度应当注重立法的国际化,进而使中国的仲裁制度能够更好地服务社会经济。 所有国家的仲裁立法和国际仲裁规则,都把仲裁协议作为仲裁管辖权取得的基础。没有仲裁协议,仲裁也就无从谈起,所做仲裁裁决也就没有法律效力。国际商事仲裁协议的性质主要有四个学说理论,它们是契约论、司法权理论、混合理论、自治论,笔者赞同契约论,认为契约性是仲裁协议的本质属性。 国际商事仲裁协议成立的有效条件分为一般要件和特殊要件两方面。仲裁协议内容也必须是可执行的,如果仲裁协议内容对仲裁的约定不可执行,那么仲裁协议内容就毫无意义。国际商事仲裁协议生效后会对当事人、仲裁机构、法院产生法律效力。首先是对双方当事人产生约束力;其次是仲裁协议中会约定仲裁机构,也就是对仲裁机构产生约束力。 国际商事仲裁协议效力扩张问题,有瑕疵的国际商事仲裁协议效力的认定及国际商事仲裁协议第三人的效力问题等,这些都是国际商事仲裁中出现的新问题,也是我国国际商事仲裁研究必须面对的问题。大多数国家在立法和实践上都对这些问题采取鼓励和支持的态度,我国亦应如此。 中国加入WTO后,国际商事仲裁统一化运动必然会对中国产生影响。而我国仲裁法律制度还存在缺陷,其中对仲裁协议内容的严格规定有别于大多数国家,这种限定实际是在当事人仲裁意愿之外另行附加条件,会导致当事人的仲裁意愿得不到尊重,这与仲裁的本质不相符。我国仲裁法律制度的修改完善既要考虑世界先进仲裁立法,又要结合中国国情,这样才能兼具世界性、民族性、现代性。
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration develops with the development of the world economy. China's arbitration system starts late and has obvious Chinese characteristics. After China's entry into WTO, it has a great impact on the world's economic and trade. However, with the rapid development of the world economy, a large number of disputes and economic disputes have also appeared, which has played an objective role in the promotion of commercial arbitration in China. At the same time, it is also required that China's arbitration system should pay attention to the internationalization of legislation. So that China's arbitration system can better serve the social economy. The arbitration legislation and international arbitration rules of all countries regard arbitration agreement as the basis for the acquisition of arbitration jurisdiction. Without the arbitration agreement, arbitration would not be possible. The nature of the international commercial arbitration agreement mainly has four theories, they are contract theory, judicial power theory, mixed theory, autonomy theory, the author agrees with the contract theory. Contract is the essential attribute of arbitration agreement. The effective conditions for the establishment of an international commercial arbitration agreement can be divided into two aspects: general elements and special elements. The content of the arbitration agreement must also be executable, if the agreement of arbitration agreement is not enforceable. The content of the arbitration agreement is meaningless. The international commercial arbitration agreement will have legal effect on the parties, the arbitration institution and the court after it comes into effect. Second, arbitration agreement will be agreed to arbitration institutions, that is to say, binding on arbitration institutions. The expansion of the validity of the international commercial arbitration agreement, the recognition of the validity of the defective international commercial arbitration agreement and the effectiveness of the third party of the international commercial arbitration agreement are all new problems in the international commercial arbitration. It is also a problem that must be faced in the study of international commercial arbitration in our country. Most countries adopt the attitude of encouraging and supporting these problems in legislation and practice, and so should our country. After China's entry into WTO, the unification of international commercial arbitration is bound to have an impact on China. However, there are still some defects in China's arbitration legal system, in which the strict provisions on the contents of arbitration agreements are different from those in most countries. This kind of limitation is to attach conditions in addition to the parties' willingness to arbitrate, which will result in the parties' willingness to arbitrate not to be respected. This is inconsistent with the essence of arbitration. The revision and perfection of China's arbitration legal system should not only consider the advanced arbitration legislation in the world, but also combine with the national conditions of China, so that it can have both cosmopolitan, national and modern characteristics.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭剑伟;;浅析仲裁第三人制度的构建[J];长春教育学院学报;2012年01期
2 王毅;;仲裁条款约定法律视角分析[J];江苏技术师范学院学报;2012年01期
3 唐蕴锋;仲裁条款对第三人的效力[J];电子科技大学学报(社科版);2002年01期
4 余劲松;论跨国公司责任的法律依据[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年03期
5 翟云岭;孙得胜;;论所有权保留[J];法学家;2010年01期
6 沈四宝;沈健;;中国商事仲裁制度的特征与自主创新[J];法学;2010年12期
7 刘晓红;;海峡两岸仲裁裁决相互认可与执行制度之检视与修正[J];法学;2011年12期
8 罗涵君;论国际商事仲裁协议的法律规制[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;1997年06期
9 赵秀文;;从宁波工艺品公司案看我国法院对涉外仲裁协议的监督[J];时代法学;2010年05期
10 刘德福,徐俊;论仲裁协议的效力及其瑕疵补救[J];价格月刊;2004年12期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨彩霞;;浅析欧盟法对仲裁协议效力保障之削弱兼评欧盟法院West Tankers案[A];中国仲裁与司法论坛暨2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 刘晓红;国际商事仲裁协议的法理与实证研究[D];华东政法学院;2004年
2 郭晓文;国际商事仲裁协议制度研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 汪明月;国际商事仲裁协议效力扩张问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2010年
2 邓娟;国际商事争议可仲裁性之扩展[D];西南政法大学;2011年
3 吴琼;合同转让产生的国际商事仲裁协议效力问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2003年
4 陈瑞子;论债权转让后仲裁协议对未签字人的效力[D];中国政法大学;2003年
5 吉爽;论国际商事仲裁管辖权异议问题[D];中国政法大学;2010年
,本文编号:1462148
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1462148.html