论ICSID仲裁中最惠国待遇条款的适用

发布时间：2018-01-29 12:16

本文关键词： 最惠国待遇条款争端解决 ICSID仲裁　出处：《新疆大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：最惠国待遇条款是当代国际商事条约的重要内容，也是多边主义的核心，同时也被称为国际投资协议的基石。一直以来，最惠国待遇条款只适用于实体问题，但是近年来不少投资者都主张将最惠国待遇条款扩展适用于争端解决程序，即通过援引最惠国条款适用第三方条约中更为有利的条约权利。国际仲裁实践以及国际法学者在这个问题上都存在着很大分歧。本文探讨的中心问题是，在基础条约没有规定最惠国待遇条款可以在争端解决程序中加以适用时，最惠国条款能否适用于争端解决程序。具体来说，就是投资者能否援引最惠国待遇条款进而享有第三方条约中有关争端解决程序的条约待遇。纵观全文，本文首先介绍最惠国待遇的历史沿革及基本理论，接着阐述争议问题的起源，并通过对相关案例的分析，提出本文对于争议问题即最惠国条款能否适用于争端解决事项的看法，最后为我国应如何应对国际新形势提出建言。本文除了引言和结语外，主要由四部分组成：本文第一部分对最惠国待遇的基本理论做以简单分析，并对最惠国待遇条款的一般适用范围及在国际投资仲裁中的适用范围作以介绍；第二部分从国际仲裁实践中最最惠国待遇的扩大适用进行归纳；第三部分基于前述分析，探讨最惠国待遇条款的本质；第四部分以Ekran(伊佳兰有限公司)诉中国案为切入点深入介绍了我国未来涉诉的威胁之大，面对Ekran案带给我们的考验和警示，，我们应在加强理论研究的基础上，同时在实践操作方面进一步完善，才能使我国在国际舞台上展现其大国形象，并能够在国际经济活动中获得更多的经济利益。
[Abstract]:The most-favoured-nation clause is an important part of contemporary international commercial treaties and the core of multilateralism, and it is also called the cornerstone of international investment agreements. However, in recent years, many investors have advocated the extension of MFN clauses to dispute settlement procedures. That is, the application of the more favorable treaty rights in third-party treaties by invoking the MFN clause. International arbitration practice and international law scholars have great differences on this issue. The central question discussed in this paper is whether the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied to the dispute settlement procedure when the basic treaty does not provide that the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied in the dispute settlement procedure. That is whether investors can invoke the most-favoured-nation clause and then enjoy the treaty treatment related to the dispute settlement procedure in third-party treaties. Throughout the full text, this paper first introduces the historical evolution and basic theory of MFN treatment. Then the origin of the dispute is expounded, and through the analysis of relevant cases, this paper puts forward the opinion of whether the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied to the dispute settlement. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the new international situation. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly consists of four parts: the first part of this paper makes a simple analysis of the basic theory of most-favoured-nation treatment. The general scope of application of MFN clause and the scope of application in international investment arbitration are also introduced. The second part summarizes the application of the most-favoured-nation treatment in the practice of international arbitration. The third part discusses the essence of the most-favoured-nation clause based on the above analysis. The 4th part takes Ekran (Igaran Co., Ltd.) v. China as the starting point to introduce the great threat of the future litigation in China, facing the test and warning brought to us by the Ekran case. On the basis of strengthening theoretical research and further perfecting in practice and operation, we can make our country show its image as a big country on the international stage and gain more economic benefits in international economic activities.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】